Search for: "State v. Family Child Care"
Results 421 - 440
of 3,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
(579) Yet, as Fulton v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:58 am
Supreme Court decisions regarding the fundamental right to parent one’s child, he wrote: “United States Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor wrote on behalf of the Court in the case of Troxel v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 6:14 pm
-H., 2000 WI 42, 234 Wis. 2d 606, 610 N.W.2d 475 and Stickles v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:06 am
” Family law attorney Mark A. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:41 am
In Application of Gavia v Hernandez, 2013 WL 6115725 (D. [read post]
Estrada v. Salas-Perez, 2012 WL 4503147 (N.D.Ill.) [Mexico][Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm]
20 Nov 2012, 8:20 am
In Estrada v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:24 pm
” Holder v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:10 am
The Child Care Act, 1991 provides the main legislative framework allowing the State to intervene in respect of a child who ‘requires care and protection’. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
In the year 2000, a lifetime ago in family law terms, the Supreme Court issued an important decision, Troxel v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 8:45 am
According to Petitioner, she never consented to the Child staying in the United States, and Respondent refused to return the Child to Jamaica despite frequent requests for her return. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 9:12 am
The divorce case of Iliff v. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 8:22 am
The Court found the following reasonable: for an associate counsel with fourteen years of experience in matrimonial litigation and family law, $275/hr.; for another associate attorney with ten years of experience and who served on the Young Lawyers Sub-Committee of the New Jersey State Bar Association Family Law Executive Committee, $225/hr. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 6:44 am
This is the question of the Oglala Sioux v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 2:34 pm
"6.22 The stated purpose of the Child Care Act 1991 is “to provide for the care and protection of children and for related matters. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 10:11 am
(Indian Child Welfare Act, application of)In re McCarrick/Lamoreaux (Indian Child Welfare Act, Michigan Indian Family Preservation Act)In the matter of L.M. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:38 pm
On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in Obergefell v. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
This articulation should reflect a careful consideration of the stated basis for its exercise of discretion, the parties’ circumstances, and its reasoning why there [should or] should not be a departure from the prescribed percentage. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 9:47 am
Cotton stated in a December 10th media release, “Fathers have an obligation to care for their children. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 1:19 pm
In London Borough of Town Hamlets v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 2:00 am
Related articles Tennessee Family Law Legislative Update 2013 (herstontennesseefamilylaw.com) Change of Child Custody Reversed in Crossville Post-Divorce Dispute: Garrett v. [read post]
