Search for: "State v. Fischer" Results 421 - 440 of 763
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2016, 5:44 am by Amy Howe
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger criticizes a recent story in The Washington Post on the Court’s recent decision in Hurst v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:57 am by Amy Howe
Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 2:28 pm by Andrew Hamm
Howard Fischer of Havasu News reviews Harris v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 3:52 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The case then gets more and more technical and some readers will probably lose interest along the way, but it stands for an important point: some appeals are premature and have to wait until the case is over.The case is Fischer v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 6:52 am
  As you would expect if you read the title or had analyzed the trends of when we post about food cases, Arnold v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:55 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday the Court announced that it had granted review in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 7:12 am by Amy Howe
In the Havasu News, Howard Fischer reports that on Monday the Justices “refused to disturb lower court rulings which upheld a 2011 Arizona law that only the two parties with the highest number of adherents get to be listed on” the state’s voter registration forms. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 8:06 pm by Patricia Salkin
Amendola v Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of West Haven, 2015 WL 8134019 (CT App. 12/15/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Variances [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 7:29 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday’s oral arguments in Fisher v. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 3:34 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: In the Yuma Sun, Howard Fischer previews next week’s oral arguments in Harris v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:14 am by Jim Sedor
Before he ever took his first law class, he served as his own lawyer, filing the original complaint in what is now called Shapiro v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:58 am by Amy Howe
At the Arizona Daily Star, Howard Fischer reports on the briefs filed by Arizona’s redistricting commission in Harris v. [read post]