Search for: "State v. Font"
Results 421 - 440
of 865
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2015, 4:39 am
Above the homeowner’s address, the letter stated in large bold font: “Loan Payment Change Request. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 9:02 am
In fairness, the State Dept. delivered only one cable in this format, with type so tiny I called it Lilliputian Font, maybe 4 pt in actual size. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 2:54 am
This case is Kelly-Brown v Winfrey, No. 11 cv 7875 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 2:33 pm
Outros autores a desenvolveram, mas o fato é que no século XXI a formulação teórica de Von Bertalanffy, atende a várias ciências. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:56 am
Innovation Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 8:23 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
The Court stated the question thus: Does the Lanham Act allow the owner of a foreign mark that is not registered in the United States and further has never used the mark in United States commerce assert priority rights over the mark that is registered in the United States by another party and used in United States commerce? [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 4:10 am
Homeland Housewares, LLC v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:43 am
Turning to the issue of likelihood of consumer confusion, the Ninth Circuit stated that it had to use the factors from AMF, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 9:07 am
Charbucks case (decision here, posted by Marty; the real name of the case is Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
The 4th quarter decisions are highlighted in bold font. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 10:31 am
In Nemphos v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 7:06 am
" Unimed Pharmaceuticals LLC et al v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 7:14 am
CUS Nashville Employee Terminated for Facebook Message Fails to State Public Policy Claim — Barnett v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 6:27 am
Pom Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 4:49 am
Homeland Housewares, LLC v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 2:32 am
The second scenario is where both rights fall within the hands of the same owner, as in Case C-377/05 Christian Dior v Evora. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 3:53 am
A BUSINESSMAN has been ordered to hand over £6.5 million to his former employers after falsely claiming via a Doctor’s Soul & Conscience letter that he was suffering from depression to avoid appearing in court.Paul McKenzie sent the document, known in Scots Law as a soul and conscious certificate, to a judge at the Court of Session in Edinburgh after being being sued for breaking the terms of a severance package.Mr McKenzie had sold his debt collection agency Mackenzie Hall Holdings… [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 6:13 am
It observed that the Tenth Circuit’s ruling in Shankle v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 6:37 am
The State Department defected from Courier a decade ago in favor of Times New Roman. [read post]
