Search for: "State v. Forty"
Results 421 - 440
of 2,712
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V A. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
" He gave some examples of why the cost of this litigation was so high—searching through "millions" of emails and reviewing "hundreds of thousands" of documents during discovery, over forty depositions taken, and a forty-page motion for summary judgment. [read post]
23 Sep 2012, 12:00 pm
This is the doctrine followed by forty-six states. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 12:15 am
Wisconsin supports this conclusion, as does the practice of forty-three states and the federal government of appointing counsel before, at, or just after the initial appearance. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 3:45 pm
In Sullivan v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 8:16 am
SANCHEZ v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 3:45 am
State v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 4:59 pm
Additional Resources: Lopez v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 2:02 am
Solicitor General regarding the matter of Heien v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
On Monday, the Eleventh Circuit, with a pretty tough panel (Chief Judge Edmondson, and Judges Tjoflat and Hill) affirmed a below guidelines sentence in United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 12:38 pm
Shortly after 11:00 p.m., the SOT began decontaminating forty-nine persons who had been exposed to mercury, including plaintiff and others, who are deaf. [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:00 am
"Finally, opined the Appellate Division, Petitioners' membership reclassification did not violate Article V, §7 of the New York State Constitution which, in pertinent part, provides that "After July first, nineteen hundred forty, membership in any pension or retirement system of the state or of a civil division thereof shall be a contractual relationship, the benefits of which shall not be diminished or impaired", since "petitioners… [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:00 am
"Finally, opined the Appellate Division, Petitioners' membership reclassification did not violate Article V, §7 of the New York State Constitution which, in pertinent part, provides that "After July first, nineteen hundred forty, membership in any pension or retirement system of the state or of a civil division thereof shall be a contractual relationship, the benefits of which shall not be diminished or impaired", since "petitioners… [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:00 am
"Finally, opined the Appellate Division, Petitioners' membership reclassification did not violate Article V, §7 of the New York State Constitution which, in pertinent part, provides that "After July first, nineteen hundred forty, membership in any pension or retirement system of the state or of a civil division thereof shall be a contractual relationship, the benefits of which shall not be diminished or impaired", since "petitioners… [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:00 am
"Finally, opined the Appellate Division, Petitioners' membership reclassification did not violate Article V, §7 of the New York State Constitution which, in pertinent part, provides that "After July first, nineteen hundred forty, membership in any pension or retirement system of the state or of a civil division thereof shall be a contractual relationship, the benefits of which shall not be diminished or impaired", since "petitioners… [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 10:51 am
Facts: This case (State of North Carolina v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 5:08 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:44 am
Johnson, which overruled State v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:01 pm
The United States Supreme Court already has turned to foreign and international law in its decisions on the death penalty; in the majority opinion in Roper v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 4:05 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
