Search for: "State v. Freedom of Information Commission"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,705
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2018, 1:19 am
Some guidance has however been given in Ryanair Ltd v PR Aviation BV (Case C-30/14) and Verwertungsgesellschaft Wort (VG Wort) v Kyocera and others (case 457/11). [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 3:47 pm
State v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 6:42 am
As it has been left up to Member States to balance individual rights and the freedom of expression and information (based on GDPR Article 85), a Member State’s supervisory authority or courts may reach a different conclusion on global de-referencing. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 2:28 pm
It recalled that in paragraph 15 of its judgment in Case C-391/92 Commission v Greece that rules restricting the marketing of products to certain points of sale, and having the effect of limiting the commercial freedom of economic operators, without affecting the actual characteristics of the products referred to, constitute a selling arrangement. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 6:57 am
The court continued, noting that,[a]t the outset, we note the First Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees freedom of the press and the Sixth Amendment guarantees a public trial by an impartial jury. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:12 am
” The ICO has also announced a public consultation on how the regulator prioritizes freedom of information complaints. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 10:03 am
Bush (2004) and Hamdan v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
The case of the day, Harris v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 12:48 pm
See Galland v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 9:14 am
Now, in answering a question of “great general importance” the apex court has held that the Convention does not guarantee freedom of movement for refugees between a state’s dependent territory and its mainland. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 5:13 pm
United States (2001), GPS location tracking in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 4:33 pm
That exercise is primarily a function of national courts, in respect of which states enjoy a margin of appreciation, subject to the supervision of the Strasbourg Court [96] – [97]. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:01 am
Nevertheless, following their introduction in the Special Immigration Appeals Commission Act 1997 (which was the Government’s response to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in Chahal v United Kingdom (1997) 23 EHRR 413), they have been used in variety of different types of case, ranging from control order proceedings to parole board hearings, to data protection proceedings and freedom of information claims. [read post]
21 May 2020, 4:35 pm
The move was rejected by the NZ Commerce Commission. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:09 pm
Circuit heard oral arguments in this case, Mozilla v FCC. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 8:55 am
” Id.; see also State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 3:58 am
Background Freedom Companies and Provider Power Companies supplied natural gas and electricity to customers in New Hampshire and other New England states. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 3:58 am
Background Freedom Companies and Provider Power Companies supplied natural gas and electricity to customers in New Hampshire and other New England states. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:55 am
Specifications of the NTD procedures such as the time for an intermediary to act following a notice, the need to inform or consult the provider of the alleged illegal information, the need for further transparency on NTD procedures, the consequences of submitting wrong notices and the instruments for removing or disabling access to illegal content will be addressed by the impact assessment. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:20 am
These three paragraphs state cumulative conditions. [read post]
