Search for: "State v. Furnish" Results 421 - 440 of 2,595
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2010, 7:20 am
The Bankruptcy Code allows each state to adopt its own exemption laws, which the debtor can select instead of the federal exemptions. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
The court’s decision dramatically expands the number of investor suits against pharmaceutical companies that state a claim and substantially increases the pressure on companies to settle meritless claims. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:43 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
The Court of Appeal decision The Court of Appeal reviewed a number of authorities on the meaning of “house”, including Lake v Bennett [1970] 1 Q.B. 663, Tandon v Trustees of Spurgeons Homes [1982] A.C. 755, Boss Holdings Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties Ltd [2008] 1 W.L.R. 289, (where the House of Lords held that, when deciding whether a building had been designed or adapted for living in, one is largely concerned with the physical state of the… [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
" The state Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in 2014 adopted a rule (R 325.176(12)) requiring that any request for a non-medical exemption be certified by the local health department after giving the parents warning of the risks of their child not receiving vaccines.The complaint (full text) in Nikolao v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 11:39 am
As an example of this alleged contributory infringement, Kimball cites Bradley Home Furnishings' website, which Kimball states features an unauthorized "Kimball Bedroom Collection" that originated from Defendant Coaster: Kimball indicates in the complaint that it first informed Defendant less than a month before this lawsuit was filed that it believed it held superior rights to the KIMBALL trademark but states that Coaster "continues its unlawful use… [read post]