Search for: "State v. Garrett"
Results 421 - 440
of 621
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:58 am
” Yesterday’s second argument was in Barr v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:58 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:22 am
” Garrett Epps remarks in The Atlantic on the “reduced state” of the Court as it awaits the addition of a ninth justice: “Call it Schrodinger’s Court. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 11:20 am
With that all said, here are fifteen new or forthcoming works on the Supreme Court: Erwin Chemerinsky, The Case Against the Supreme Court Richard Davis, Covering the United States Supreme Court in the Digital Age Garrett Epps, American Justice 2014: Nine Clashing Visions on the Supreme Court Lewis L. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 12:29 pm
Terrell & Garrett, Inc., a 1981 case. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 4:43 am
Briefly: At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps discusses Lynch v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:12 am
New Hampshire and CompuCredit Corp. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 8:02 am
“New Orleans Prosecutorial Disclosure in Practice after Connick v. [read post]
30 Jun 2018, 4:08 am
United States. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen weighs in on employment-discrimination case Fort Bend County v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 7:09 pm
Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:56 am
Whitford and Benisek v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 3:55 am
Briefly: At AlterNet, Bill Blum writes that in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 5:41 am
” At ACSblog, Brandon Garrett urges the Court to grant review (again) in the case of Texas death row inmate Scott Panetti to “make clearer than it did already in Panetti’s case years ago that the Eighth Amendment forbids the state to execute individuals who are medically diagnosed as psychotic. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 5:46 am
” Yesterday this blog continued its online symposium on United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2018, 12:48 pm
In United States v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:58 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 8:32 am
Bruce Ackerman summarized oral arguments in Smith v. [read post]
