Search for: "State v. Garrette" Results 421 - 440 of 596
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2020, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At AlterNet, Bill Blum writes that in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 5:41 am by Amy Howe
” At ACSblog, Brandon Garrett urges the Court to grant review (again) in the case of Texas death row inmate Scott Panetti to “make clearer than it did already in Panetti’s case years ago that the Eighth Amendment forbids the state to execute individuals who are medically diagnosed as psychotic. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 5:46 am by Amy Howe
” Yesterday this blog continued its online symposium on United States v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 8:32 am by Garrett Hinck
Bruce Ackerman summarized oral arguments in Smith v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for USA Today, Brandon Garrett urges the justices to review Dassey v. [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 4:27 am by Garrett Hinck
Garrett Hinck  posted the European Commission’s report on the U.S. [read post]
4 Nov 2017, 4:13 am by Garrett Hinck
Bruce Ackerman summarized oral arguments in Smith v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 11:12 am by Garrett Hinck
Sabrina McCubbin summarized pre-trial motions in Smith v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
” At ACS Blog, Brandon Garrett weighs in on the court’s ruling last week in McWilliams v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 8:27 am by Sonya Hubbard
All three non-partisan, not-for-profit organizations say that a battle of “David v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:02 am by GuestPost
It is interesting that at the ECHR the state appeared to represent that defeat as evidence of an anti-abortion majority in the state, particularly when only some 42% of the population turned out to vote. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:28 am by Edith Roberts
In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps argues that “the ‘travel ban’ case is the strongest candidate for Establishment Clause standing I have seen in my long lifetime,” because Trump v. [read post]