Search for: "State v. General Development Corp." Results 421 - 440 of 3,025
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2014, 1:22 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) Since 2010, I have been posting on the development  of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
  In a hopeful development, after Conte was decided, the California Supreme Court, in an asbestos case, rejected the sort of foreseeability uber alles rationale on which Contewas based:An interpretation of [the law] that would require a manufacturer to war [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:41 am by Antonin I. Pribetic
Citing with approval the recent  judgment of the International Court of Justice (“ICJ”) in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:50 am by Jason Rantanen
Dispute Over Method 207 The United States Pharmacopeial Convention (USP) is an SDO that develops standards for testing the quality and purity of foods and drugs. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 8:50 am by MBettman
(AMP), a wholesale supplier for municipal power systems, sought to develop and construct a coal-fired power generating plant in Meigs County. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:29 pm by Bexis
Ct. 1937 (2009), and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 10:35 am by Abbott & Kindermann
As a result of a decision made in 2002 by the Corps of Engineers and the State Historic Preservation Officer (“SHPO”), a section 106 consultation was undertaken, with the result being the development of a historic properties management plan. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:30 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp., 2007 WL 2726259 (S.D. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:28 am by Jason Rantanen
As Justice Breyer remarked at the oral argument in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:13 pm by Gene Quinn
Shortly after State Street the Federal Circuit reaffirmed its decisions in State Street Bank and Alappat in AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 3:59 am by Michael Erdle
In Spirit Bay Developments Limited Partnership v. [read post]