Search for: "State v. Grounds" Results 421 - 440 of 40,868
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2010, 1:16 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: In 1874, the Supreme Court held in Murdock v City of Memphis that it lacked “jurisdiction” to review a state supreme court’s interpretation of state law, even in cases that present federal-law claims. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 12:17 pm by Mark Murakami
  Hold on, don't close the post, I'm posting because it arose out of the grounding of the M/V Cape Flattery, near Barbers Point, Oahu. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 7:24 am by Richard M. Re
Finally, Justice Alito dissented on grounds partly endorsed by Kennedy and Thomas. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 2:12 am by Gilles Cuniberti
On December 14th, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dismissed a suit seeking confirmation of an international arbitration award on the ground of forum non conveniens in Figueiredo Ferraz e Engenharia de Projeto Ltda. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 2:37 pm by Daily Record Staff
Because of our disposition of Cooper’s convictions on that ground alone, we need not address the merits of his second challenge. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 10:35 am by Richard M. Re
Earlier this month, the Court granted review of Hughes v.... [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:38 pm
  The Court stated that conflict preemption does not apply because the common-law ground for “vacating an arbitration award will not conflict with any of the statutory grounds or render them nugatory. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 9:37 am by Curtis Bradley, Jack Goldsmith
The Supreme Court seemed to go out of its way in American Insurance Association v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:15 pm
., guards) who voluntarily elect to pay market rates to live on the grounds of San Quentin prison?! [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 12:11 pm by Howard Bashman
“‘I’m Doing It for the Babies’: Inside the Ground Game to Reverse Roe v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 4:07 am by Lawrence Solum
" Even if grounded in eugenic assumptions widely held at the time, Buck v. [read post]