Search for: "State v. H. E. H." Results 421 - 440 of 3,296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2015, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Butler, John Edward Fowler Distinguished Professor of Law and International Affairs, Pennsylvania State UniversityEDITORIAL BOARDJean Allain, Queen's University, Belfast Olga V. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2015-12-26 https://t.co/KmW6au1DJn -> Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2015-12-26: File sharing case proceeds ALTICOR INC v UMG RECORDINGS h… https://t.co/HECW6Un0qF -> Road to free trade agreement vote just keeps getting longer | Star Tribune https://t.co/xp3x6IJfXc -> The 1709 Blog: 2015 – THE COPYRIGHT YEAR https://t.co/8SeXiJkERB -> Public support for TPP increases https://t.co/Mut36nkFL7 -> Computer… [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 7:25 am by Jeralyn
Meanwhile, the FTC has filed a lawsuit in the District of Nevada, FTC v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
Entities subject to the Open Meetings Law and the Freedom of Information LawMatter of Reese v Daines, 2008 NY Slip Op 51879(U), decided on September 15, 2008, Supreme Court, Erie County, Patrick H. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:55 am by Bill Marler
  For example, produce has, since at least 1991, been the source of substantial numbers of outbreak-related E. coli O157:H7 infections.[19]  Other unusual vehicles for causing E. coli O157:H7 infections have included apple juice, yogurt, dried salami, and mayonnaise.[20] According to a recent study, an “estimated 73,480 illnesses due to E. coli O157:H7 infections occur each year in the United States, leading to an estimated 2,168 hospitalizations… [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am by Carolina Attorneys
The State dismissed one of the counts on 4 May 2017, leaving Defendant charged with two Class C and one Class H counts of felony embezzlement. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 9:26 pm by Aaron Barkoff
 In its brief, the Solicitor General recommended that the Court deny review, stating that the case "would provide a poor vehicle for the Court to consider the application of Section 271(e)(1) to post-approval activities." [read post]
18 Apr 2006, 3:50 pm by Frodnesor
" Even if it were treated as surplusage, though, the court held that it should not give meaning to surplusage if doing so would be demonstrably at odds with the legislative intent, citing Lamie v. [read post]
18 Apr 2006, 3:50 pm by Frodnesor
" Even if it were treated as surplusage, though, the court held that it should not give meaning to surplusage if doing so would be demonstrably at odds with the legislative intent, citing Lamie v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:30 am by Wells Bennett
Additionally, a motions hearing in United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage of the solicitor general’s motion in United States v. [read post]