Search for: "State v. H. E. H." Results 421 - 440 of 3,299
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2021, 9:00 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Ryan Amelio
”[20] OSHA in the 1991 Standard relied on its reasoning from the 1978 Occupational Exposure to Lead Final Standard (the “1978 Standard”) where it rejected biological testing of workers as a means of monitoring employer compliance with occupational lead exposure limits.[21] In the 1978 Standard, OSHA concluded that “[a]ttempting to compel workers to subject themselves to detailed medical examinations presents the possibility of clashes with legitimate privacy and religious… [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm by Stephen Page
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm by Stephen Page
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 4:17 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Such spouses will be allowed to work just by having the status of an E-1, E-2, E-3, H-4, or L-2 dependent and having a valid I-94 arrival/departure record with the classification as an E, H-4, or L-2 spouse. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 2:07 pm by Alka Bahal
On November 11, 2021 American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) and its litigation partners Wasden Banias and Steven Brown, announce the historic settlement with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in Shergill, et al. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
To quote one such case, [E]vidence submitted to the Court highlights the problems pseudonyms may pose at trial and the confusion it will undoubtably produce, despite counsel's best efforts to adequately prepare their respective clients. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court gets ready to hear New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 4:01 am by Jan von Hein
The court held that the enforcement provision Article V (1) lit. a New York Convention applies already before or during arbitral proceedings. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 7:00 am by Jonathan Pyzer
Canadian cases where the accused was found guilty of voyeurism: Placing a camera in the ceiling of the male staff bathroom (R v B.H. 2017 ONCJ)Secretly recording persons in the restroom of a restaurant (R v Bosomworth 2015 BCPC)Filming multiple people in multiple public washrooms, including home washroom (R v Dekker 2014 ABPC)An obsession with a victim led an accused to spy on her at work, including while she was in the shower, and recording her while she was… [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:37 am by Jennifer Davis
Sayler, Richard H., Boyer, Barry B., & Gooding, Jr., Robert E. (1968)  The Warren Court: a Critical Analysis. [read post]