Search for: "State v. Hart "
Results 421 - 440
of 1,144
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am
In Broida, the court concluded that jurisdiction could be exercised over an action involving the internal affairs of a foreign corporation doing business in New York, unless New York was an inappropriate or inconvenient forum (id. at 91-92; see Hart v General Motors Corp., 129 AD2d 179, 185-186 [1st Dept 1987], lv denied 70 NY2d 608 [1987]). [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 2:49 pm
Miller v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 12:43 pm
the Hart and Keller v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 12:30 am
Williams's Defenders of the Unborn: The Pro-Life Movement before Roe v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 4:07 pm
The Panopticon Blog has a post entitled “Enhanced Criminal Records Check Mate” concerning the case of R (P & A) v Secretary of State for Justice [2016] EWHC 89 (Admin). [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 9:15 am
I hear them in the voice of my Constitutional Law professor, Robert Bork, and in the words of John Hart Ely, whose scholarly elaboration of the logic of Footnote Four in Democracy and Distrust posed the most cogent challenge to the Court’s expansive constitutional decisions in the realm of reproductive autonomy. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:48 am
And I wonder: If the Hartes had made their cause of action trespass rather than 42 U.S.C. 1983, should qualified immunity still apply given that there was no qualified immunity doctrine in cases like Entick v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 9:53 am
., The Law of Misstatements: 50 Years on from Hedley Byrne v Heller (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2015). [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
Wright, After Obergefell v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 2:07 pm
Vehicle Intelligence v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 1:40 pm
(See Coldren v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 1:40 pm
(See Coldren v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 1:21 pm
See United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:26 am
International Trade Secret and Non-Compete Law Update In the third installment, attorneys Wan Li, Ming Henderson and Daniel Hart focused on non-compete and trade secret considerations from an international perspective. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 6:32 am
This is the executive summary of the decision (Bemejo v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 2:30 pm
See Hart v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
They were: Rylands v Fletcher (1866) LR 3 HL 330 Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] 1 QB 256 Salomon v A Salomon & Co [1897] AC 22 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions [1935] AC 462 Liversidge v Anderson [1942] AC 206 Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130 Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 Anisminic… [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:04 am
Hart’s decision in Berger v Friedman, Short Form Order, Index No. 702322/15 [Sup Ct Queens County Oct. 27, 2015], centers on a wholesale distributor of electrical parts and equipment founded in 1945 by the grandparents of the three sibling litigants who each acquired a one-third interest from their parents in 1993. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:58 am
Commentary comes from Lorran Hart Ferguson at the University of Kentucky Election Law Society. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 2:50 am
Hart, 191 AD2d 991 [1993]). [read post]