Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 421 - 440
of 8,233
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
’” West Virginia v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:13 pm
Lite-Netics LLC v. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am
This Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:31 am
In Impression Products v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 7:38 am
Musto v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 12:29 pm
A trademark application filing and fee payment with the national or regional office can secure a trademark and usually lasts ten years unless the holder renews by paying additional fees. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 6:31 am
Georg Werner) has meanwhile published (on a website run by the Bavarian state government) two Nokia v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 3:50 pm
The first case, Biden v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:54 am
Trump v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:28 am
First, she said the definition of holder of record, which the JOBS Act increased, may obscure the true number of shareholders in private funds because a single intermediary can hold shares for many investors.Thornton also explained that in private markets, there often is not much disclosure by companies to investors, information that is available may be untimely, and financials are not always subject to independent audits. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 11:58 am
Wilkinson v. [read post]
Florida Prohibits a Disinterested Appraiser From Having a Contingent Interest in the Appraisal Award
10 Feb 2023, 6:51 am
State Farm Florida Ins. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 8:34 am
References below to legislation are to ITEPA unless stated otherwise. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am
Having left the German market following similar findings of infringement there, the question remains whether Oppo will also be willing to give up the UK market following this decision rather than facing the prospect of a global FRAND licence rate determined by the English court, which is often considered to be more friendly to patent holders than implementers. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 6:06 am
The City of Pikeville appealed a decision from the state’s Court of Appeals, which held that concealed carry permits issued by the state allow permit-holders to carry weapons within federally protected school zones. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 5:15 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
S’holder Derivative Litig., No. 2021-0324, 2023 WL 387292 (Del. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
S’holder Derivative Litig., No. 2021-0324, 2023 WL 387292 (Del. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 6:12 am
Is this case, Cave v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
The court stated that it did not need to decide whether liability existed under the prong 1 claim to dispose of the motion to dismiss, but noted that a report prepared by external counsel indicated that the company had a “woefully inadequate compliance system. [read post]
