Search for: "State v. House" Results 421 - 440 of 28,522
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The explanatory memorandum of the original draft highlighted that the June 2022 US Supreme Court decision to strike down Roe v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds ofeach House, remove such disability. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:30 am by Christine Bartholomew
David Rapallo, House Rules: Congress and the Attorney-Client Privilege, 100 Wash. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
It is now subject to the same test that Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart once used to identify pornography in the case Jacobellis v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am by INFORRM
On 1 March 2024, The Rt Hon Lucy Frazer MP, the Secretary of State for Culture Media and Sport, and The Rt Hon James Cleverly MP, the Secretary of State for the Home Department, published their decision to vary a Restriction Order from the Leveson Inquiry to allow the use of the ledger cards for the purpose of the ongoing misuse of private information claim brought by seven claimants against Associated Newspapers. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
Indeed, the House and Senate would have better records than Hamilton about House and Senate officers who drew compensation from the legislature. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 9:24 am by Giles Peaker
Ake v Lewisham Borough Council (2024) K40CL060 (Central London County Court 4 February 2024) (copy of judgment) This was a statutory appeal pursuant to section 204 of the Housing Act 1996 (‘the 1996 Act’), against a review decision made by Lewisham Borough Council on 27 February 2023. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 1:04 pm by Orin S. Kerr
This is the same mistake that the initial Fifth Circuit panel made in United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 3:06 am by jonathanturley
For example, Michael Waldman, president of New York University’s Brennan Center for Justice, noted that in 1974 the Court considered United States v. [read post]
The Alabama House passed a bill and the state Senate unanimously passed another on Thursday that would safeguard access to in-vitro fertilization (IVF) following the Alabama Supreme Court decision in LePage v. [read post]
The trial (Liberty v SSHD)  is expected to run for two days at the Royal Courts of Justice in London. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 10:32 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
 What's the upshot for Section Three and Trump v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Rachel Kleinfeld
Supreme Court had taken on new powers (in their case, the power of constitutional review) in the 1803 case, Marbury v. [read post]