Search for: "State v. L. H.-H."
Results 421 - 440
of 2,515
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
" Referencing the longstanding, basic rules of statutory interpretation, the Court of Appeals said that in such matters a court's "primary consideration is to ascertain and give effect to the intention of the [l]egislature", citing Samiento v World Yacht Inc., 10 NY3d 70. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am
” South Africa had argued that the imposition of such a requirement would follow the model the Court had used in the provisional measures phase of Ukraine v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 7:30 am
Individuals must be in one of the following categories at the time of their enlistment:· Non-Immigrant Visas: E, F, H, I, J, K, L, M, O, P, Q, R, S, T, TC, TD, TN, U OR V · Asylee, refugee, or Temporary Protected Status (TPS) 2. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 5:45 pm
Yesterday, I discussed the case of Jane Doe v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 7:36 pm
By Gerald L. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
The State dismissed one of the counts on 4 May 2017, leaving Defendant charged with two Class C and one Class H counts of felony embezzlement. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:18 pm
Posner and Adrian Vermeule Combating Contamination in Confession Cases Laura H. [read post]
Law - "Supreme Court to Hear Arguments Next Week in States' Challenge to 'Preemption' of Regulation"
25 Nov 2006, 9:20 am
The case, Watters v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 9:30 pm
Tanick on Near v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 4:18 am
Miller v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm
In Mid 2011 - the Colorado State Legislature enacted a law - House Bill 11-1064, which created a presumption, subject to the State Board of Parole, in favor of granting parole to an inmate who has reached his or her parole eligibility date and who is serving a sentence for certain drug-related crimes, provided that the offender meets other requirements specified in the bill. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 6:57 am
Partnership v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 10:33 pm
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington has certified a partial final judgment (this post continues below the document): 13-11-12 Microsoft v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
Conrad, Daniel H. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 5:13 pm
Just not the studies funded by Exxon.Loyola Law Professor (and H&L academic consultant) Rick Hasen previously posted a critique of footnote 17 on his Election Law blog. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 11:46 am
See Manfredo v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:24 am
Carlas Int’l Auto. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 5:58 am
State v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 10:25 am
L. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 5:29 pm
Bernal, Lance L. [read post]
