Search for: "State v. McDonnell " Results 421 - 440 of 634
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2017, 9:29 am by Michael C. Dorf
A judge or jury must then decide what the real reason for the firing was.The Supreme Court laid out the framework for adjudicating such cases in its 1973 ruling in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 6:00 am by Andrew Hamm
§ 666 should be construed to include quasi-sovereign public international entities like the United Nations; and (2) whether the official-act requirement under McDonnell v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 5:33 pm
  The Court narrowed the public policy exception to the right to terminate an at-will employee in McDonnell v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Andrew Hudson
  We have previously written at length on decisions of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT), or State or Federal Courts on the classification of goods for customs purposes. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:37 am by Amy Howe
In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks back at last week’s decision in Heffernan v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 8:28 am by Brian Cordery
Brian CorderyBy Nicholas Round On 10 October 2018 the Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in the matter of Icescape Limited v Ice-World International BV & Ors*. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 12:25 pm by Suzanne Ito, ACLU
Bob McDonnell denied clemency despite conclusions that she was borderline mentally retarded. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
In the Kentucky Law Journal, law student Jordan Shewmaker looks at Honeycutt v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 8:03 pm by Paul A. Prados
  If Governor McDonnell vetoes it again, Senator Saslaw stated he will not submit another redistricting bill to the Governor.What follows is what really happens.Things stay the same? [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
While Lessig treats Marshall’s opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
  When there is no direct evidence of discrimination, plaintiffs can make use of the pretext model established by the Supreme Court in 1973 in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]