Search for: "State v. McDonnell "
Results 421 - 440
of 634
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2013, 6:50 pm
On Wednesday, the Third Circuit issued a non-precedential opinion in Stacy v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:47 am
"Social Justice Meets Property Law: Realigning Patent Law’s Asymmetric Contour in Novartis. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 7:06 am
Madigan v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
McDonnell, was filed in the U.S. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 7:25 am
A state-run psychiatric hospital’s staffing directive, which restricted darker-skinned employees from working with a violent, racist patient, was not discriminatory, a federal district court in Washington ruled, in granting summary judgment to the employer (Blackburn v State of Washington Department of Social and Health Services, September 25, 2013, Leighton, R). [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 6:12 am
Bob McDonnell (R) saw the launch as a sign of his state’s growing competitiveness in the commercial space industry. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:08 am
Therefore, to survive a Motion for Summary Judgment, Ruggles was required to establish a circumstantial case under a burden shifting framework that the United States Supreme Court set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 1:27 pm
The first Virginia case after the landmark U.S. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 3:23 am
And this is common throughout the United States, according to the FEMA Mitigation Branch Director Bill McDonnell. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 1:27 pm
Bostic v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
When there is no direct evidence of discrimination, plaintiffs can make use of the pretext model established by the Supreme Court in 1973 in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:34 am
Similarly in, Quinlan v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
Over the past two-and-a-half years, we have published over a hundred posts on the NDAAs and related legal developments, including the Southern District of New York’s important decision in Hedges v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 10:42 am
The case of Smith v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 7:33 am
Tyler v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 1:47 pm
For more on Dockery v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 3:42 pm
(v) the theft of state property . . ." [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 12:09 pm
At the BC Employment Lawyer Blog, Daniel Sorensen of Waterstone Law Group wrote about the ramifications of a recent human rights tribunal decision, Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 11:00 am
This requirement stems, in part, from Diamond v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 12:21 pm
The House of Delegates rejected the views of Governor McDonnell and others in refusing to allow the restoration of civil rights to non-violent felons. [read post]
