Search for: "State v. Micheli" Results 421 - 440 of 1,866
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2007, 9:39 am
See also these cases: Deal v Deal, 197 Mich App 739, 741 (1993) (involving an Orthodox Jewish contract); Samman v Samman, Mich App, unpublished (No. 249877, November 9, 2004), lv den 473 Mich 883 (2005) (involving Islamic marriage and divorce contracts). [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 12:31 am by Gary Nitzkin
In a recent opinion in Green v Ziegelman, 282 Mich App 292 (2009), the Michigan Court of Appeals took up the case of whether a creditor can pierce the corporate veil of a corporate creditor pursuant to the Proceedings Supplementary to Judgment Act and enter a judgment against the shareholder of that corporate judgment debtor. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 12:31 am by Gary Nitzkin
In a recent opinion in Green v Ziegelman, 282 Mich App 292 (2009), the Michigan Court of Appeals took up the case of whether a creditor can pierce the corporate veil of a corporate creditor pursuant to the Proceedings Supplementary to Judgment Act and enter a judgment against the shareholder of that corporate judgment debtor. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 5:31 am by Gary Nitzkin
In a recent opinion in Green v Ziegelman, 282 Mich App 292 (2009), the Michigan Court of Appeals took up the case of whether a creditor can pierce the corporate veil of a corporate creditor pursuant to the Proceedings Supplementary to Judgment Act and enter a judgment against the shareholder of that corporate judgment debtor. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 5:31 am by Gary Nitzkin
In a recent opinion in Green v Ziegelman, 282 Mich App 292 (2009), the Michigan Court of Appeals took up the case of whether a creditor can pierce the corporate veil of a corporate creditor pursuant to the Proceedings Supplementary to Judgment Act and enter a judgment against the shareholder of that corporate judgment debtor. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 12:47 am
The Dow Chemical Co., 701 N.W.2d 684 (Mich. 2005).3. [read post]