Search for: "State v. Murray" Results 421 - 440 of 1,332
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2006, 2:52 am
The full text of yesterday's decision on same-sex marriage is available at two sites:Zappone and Gilligan v Revenue CommssionersHigh Court, Dunne J., 14 December 2006PDF version on Irish Times site: www.ireland.com/newspaper/special/2006/lesbianmarriageruling/index.pdfWord Version on KALCase site:www.kalcase.orgIn summary, on the constitutional ground, Dunne J. said that marriage meant marriage between a man and a woman, citing cases such as Murray v Ireland [1985]… [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
   There is, surprisingly, no mention of the leading English case on privacy and street photographs: Murray v Express Newspapers ([2008] EWCA Civ 446). [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 5:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Murray, Valparaiso University School of Law, What Is Transformative? [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm by Sinead Ring
Murray CJ suggested that if in the course of the hearing of an application for leave it emerges that a ground or relief can or ought to be stated with greater clarity and precision then it is desirable that the order of the High Court granting leave, if leave is granted, specify the ground or relief in such terms. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 9:52 am by Gene Quinn
United States Supreme Court I am just about out of ways to creatively announce that the United States Supreme Court has once again had a decision issue day come and go without issuing a decision in Bilski v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As the Comptroller's determination — finding that Breslin was not permanently incapacitated from performing the duties of a light-duty assignment — is supported by substantial evidence, it will not be disturbed (see Matter of Sweeney v DiNapoli, 88 AD3d 1051, 1051 [2011]; Matter of Murray v New York State Comptroller, 84 AD3d 1681, 1682-1683 [2011]; Matter of Pascale v DiNapoli, 84 AD3d at 1680; Matter of Roache v Hevesi, 38 AD3d… [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:26 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Texas Rule of Evidence 509(b) provides that There is no physician-patient privilege in criminal proceedings. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:23 am by Kent Scheidegger
On April 29, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decided a fairly typical state postconviction capital case in Commonwealth v. [read post]