Search for: "State v. NICHOLAS S." Results 421 - 440 of 1,324
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2017, 4:46 am
Nicholas Turner, Opposition No. 91214199, involving Nik Turner's application to register the mark NIK TURNER'S HAWKWIND for "Entertainment services, namely, live musical performances by an individual or musical group. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
Amy Howe analyzes yesterday’s oral argument in Kisor v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 9:41 am
Kaster) (hsj, ) (Entered: 02/18/2009)United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:30 am by Amy Howe
  Briefly: At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley discusses the Court’s recent opinion in Armstrong v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 6:17 am by David Oscar Markus
In November, it will hear arguments in United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 9:06 am by Garrett Hinck
U.S. and the hearing in ACLU v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 3:17 am by Amy Howe
In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Nicholas Stephanopoulos looks at the effect that the Court’s decision in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 9:10 am
Glassman was featured in Barronand#39;s as the top female financial advisor in the United States, and according to her website, she andquot;has been listed consistently in the top third of Barronand#39;s 100 Best Brokers. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 11:32 am by Ronald Mann
  At bottom, her answer was that this is the way bankruptcies have operated since the Court’s decision in Nicholas v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:16 am by Amy Howe
” At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley discusses whether the Court could opt to stay King v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Smith, Idaho's Law of Constitutional Interpretation: Lessons from Planned Parenthood Great Northwest v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:23 am by Amy Howe
  And Mayer Brown’s Class Defense Blog covers yesterday’s grant in DirecTV v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am by Amy Howe
At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley weighs in on King v. [read post]