Search for: "State v. National Advertising Co."
Results 421 - 440
of 772
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2014, 2:16 pm
In Gertz v. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm
One of the most important, if not the most important, United States copyright cases decided in 2013 is The Authors Guild, Inc. v Google Inc. 2013 WL 6017130 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 7:04 am
Co-option of payment processors, advertising networks, domain name registrars and search engines is another, as would be action against VPN. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 12:32 pm
This contract stated that the bag business sold by Baquet included the Benelux word mark NATHAN, which he had had registered in 1991 for leather items, clothing and shoes in Classes 18 and 25. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 12:31 pm
More were able to recognize corporate v. peer source but not near 100%. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:04 am
Also deceptive mailings: “Prize Notification Bureau” with “State of California Commisioners of Registration” seal—FTC v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 8:15 am
There remained some uncertainty about the matter in the 1940s, but then by the 1960s the First Amendment rights of nonmedia business corporations became well-settled, and in First National Bank of Boston v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 9:53 am
Quick Quiz Drive Quickly rents a taxicab from Blue Cab, Co. for $175 dollars a day. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Part 3 describes why, given the average user’s abysmal cyber hygiene, depending on users to drive the demand for better code fails as a responsible national software security policy. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 8:37 am
The lawsuit involves Capital One’s advertising of a co-branded offering to Costco members. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 11:55 pm
National Conference of Personal Managers, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 7:47 am
Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:44 am
Soon after, in 1977, this was consigned to history, when it was finally established that unmarried co-habitation is no longer regarded as an immoral purpose. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 1:43 pm
– 5:05 P.M.SESSION V (with coffee break 3:30-3:50)NYS CLE Credit: 2.0, Areas of Professional PracticeCommentators on proposals presented, and Q&A PeriodJane Ginsburg, ModeratorMorton L. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 10:30 am
Dudley v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:07 pm
Republic of Argentina, and is among co-counsel to the respondent in Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
Staying with the context of antitrust law, take the example of FTC v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:25 am
Co., 804 N.E.2d 519, 529 (Ill. 2004)). [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am
National Enquirer, 123 F.3d 1249 (9th Cir. 1997). [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 4:16 am
Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. [read post]
