Search for: "State v. Ore"
Results 421 - 440
of 2,482
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2011, 2:34 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Sapkota & Anor (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1320 (15 November 2011) Zarb & Anor v Parry & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1306 (15 November 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Youssef & Ors v The Secretary of State for Foreign And Commonwealth Affairs [2011] EWHC 3014 (Admin) (14 November 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) FHR European Ventures Llp &… [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 2:30 am
This is because a Crown act of state is a prerogative act of policy in the field of international affairs, and the rules under the doctrine provide the Government with a a defence to a claim arising from acts of state committed abroad which are otherwise suitable for adjudication by a court. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 4:24 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:47 am
Supreme Court The Health and Safety Executive v Wolverhampton City Council [2012] UKSC 34 (18 July 2012) Munir & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 32 (18 July 2012) Alvi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 33 (18 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Horn & Ors v Commercial Acceptances Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 958 (19 July… [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 1:08 pm
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Tariquez-Zaman v London Deanery of Post Graduate Medical and Dental Education [2008] EWCA Civ 1226 (06 November 2008) PS (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 1213 (06 November 2008) SK (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 1204 (06 November 2008) Blackburn & Anor v West Midlands Police [2008] EWCA Civ 1208 (06 November 2008) RA (Sri… [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 11:50 pm
In Paramount Home Entertainment International Ltd & Ors v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd & Ors [2013] EWHC 3479 (Ch), Arnold J is adding to the now long list of blocked torrent tracker sites in the UK, a list that includes Newzbin, The Pirate Bay, H33t, Torrentz, Torrent Reactor, and many others. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 4:07 pm
In a very rare outcome, in the case of R (Davis and ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2015] EWHC 2092 (Admin) the Divisional Court declared that the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014 (DRIPA) is inconsistent with European Union law and therefore is “disapplied”, although the Court suspended the effect of its order until after 31 March 2016. [read post]
28 May 2010, 3:04 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Secretary of State for the Home Department v HK (Turkey) [2010] EWCA Civ 583 (27th May 2010) Haugesund Kommune & Anor v Depfa ACS Bank [2010] EWCA Civ 579 (27 May 2010) Varsani v Relfo Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 560 (27 May 2010) Egal, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 584 (27 May 2010) Kookmin Bank v Rainy Sky SA & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 582… [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:16 am
Under the rubric of the fresh decision, in addressing whether the respondents must be admitted to the UK for settlement the court said that the obligations of a state with responsibility for refugees cannot be “exported”. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:16 am
Despite some evidence relating to some conventions, there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate a widespread and consistent state practice. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:28 am
As to the approach to be taken to justification (the burden of which falls on the government), “when the state puts forward its reasons for having countenanced the adverse treatment, it establishes justification for it unless the complainant demonstrates that it was manifestly without reasonable foundation” [66]. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 10:30 am
S52248 (Ore. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 6:43 am
State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 1:42 am
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions,heard 29-30 April. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 10:20 am
To remind – art 5 states as follows: 1. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
It was held that it was a legal impossibility for a claimant to lack knowledge of attributability for the purposes of the Limitation Act 1980 after issuing a claim, and that the correct test for when a claimant was likely to have developed the requisite state of mind to amount to “knowledge” for the purposes of s 14 of the 1980 Act was when he first came to reasonably believe the link between the facts and his injury, that is to say, held a belief which is more than a mere… [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 2:18 pm
Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 This is not a housing case, but it is an important case on costs in settled claims for judicial review, which is a major issue for many housing practitioners. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 2:18 pm
Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 This is not a housing case, but it is an important case on costs in settled claims for judicial review, which is a major issue for many housing practitioners. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 2:09 am
Paul Sheridan, Jan Burgess and Laura Swithinbank, who work within the Environment and Health and Safety teams at CMS, comment on the decision handed down in the matter of Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors [2019] UKSC 20. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 2:35 am
Nevertheless, the proportionality of a statutory measure is not to be judged by the quality of the reasons advanced in support of it in the course of parliamentary debate, or by the subjective state of mind of individual ministers or other members of the legislature. [read post]
