Search for: "State v. Quinn" Results 421 - 440 of 888
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2014, 6:44 pm by Thomas Hopson
Quinn, holding (in a five-to-four opinion by Justice Alito) that “the First Amendment prohibits the collection of an agency fee” from home health-care workers, paid by the state, “who do not want to join or support the union. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 5:55 pm
Quinn — whether this extends to personal assistants hired for ill people, and who in some ways are employed by the particular individuals, and in other ways by the state. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:27 pm by Lyle Denniston
Quinn, at a minimum, raised serious new doubt about continued majority support within the Court for a 1977 decision, Abood v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:08 pm by Mark Walsh
 June 30 is the latest the Court has sat since 1996, when the Justices took the bench on July 1 to issue just a single opinion, United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:56 am by Matt Bodie
Quinn, the assumption (that I shared) about a broad opinion was incorrect. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:42 am by Epstein Becker Green
  The Court below had agreed with the State that agency fees were justified under the Court’s earlier precedents, particularly Abood v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 10:25 am by Steven D. Schwinn
Quinn that a state cannot require nonunionized home-healthcare workers, or personal assistants, in the state's Medicaid program to pay "fair share" union dues.... [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:17 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
Quinn [SCOTUSblog backgrounder] that the state cannot require home health care workers to pay union fees. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:11 am by Walter Olson
Tweet Tags: First Amendment, labor unions, Supreme CourtGuest post, “Harris v. [read post]