Search for: "State v. Ramming" Results 421 - 440 of 524
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2010, 2:30 pm by Erin Miller
The third decision is Crawford v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:20 pm by Adam Wagner
Prisoners (as in Keenan v United Kingdom (2001) 33 EHRR 913),conscripts (Álvarez Ramón v Spain (application no 51192/99) 3 July 2001) and mental patients (Herczegfalvy v Austria (1992) 15 EHRR 437) are in a different position because the deprivation of liberty imparts more responsibility on the authorities concerned to ensure that any consequent suicidal ideation is properly dealt with. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 5:00 am by Randall Peterson
  Rather than seek permission from the Securities and Exchange Commission to exclude the proposal, the usual approach, the company instead filed suit (Apache v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 11:01 am
These are the kinds of judgments reserved to the states, and nothing in the FMIA requires states to make them on a species-wide basis or not at all. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 10:48 am by Matt Johnston
I vehemently disagree with the methods of V, from whom I've taken the titular quote. [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 2:00 am
Microsoft) (EDTexweblog.com)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC enforces permanent injunction against Microsoft Word over XML patent: i4i Limited Partnership v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 4:19 pm
According to Nagaraj,(Paragraphs 104 and 106 cited) efficiency is a variable factor and it is for the State to determine it. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 12:49 pm by Ross
I don’t see the differences v. the Lenovo S10 that he does. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 3:44 am
Thomas rammed his truck into his former girlfriend and the vehicle beside which she was standing. [read post]