Search for: "State v. Smart"
Results 421 - 440
of 2,337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2016, 12:04 pm
It's so, so nice to live in a state that has an incredibly smart state supreme court.As it happens, I was at oral argument in the California Supreme Court last week, and was incredibly -- incredibly -- impressed with the questions from the bench. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 1:45 pm
(Orin Kerr) Today the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Kentucky v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 11:49 am
(Here's the statute of Carmack in front of the Tennessee State Capitol. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
The Court has also explained how prospective profits, not prospective revenues, fall into that determination: The long-established rule in Wisconsin, stated in Buxbaum v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 1:20 pm
Which is a smart move as a way to hold his vote. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Second, the federal RFRA is unconstitutional when applied to state law under Boerne v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:18 pm
But too smart is not. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 1:30 pm
In other words, they're smart and articulate and intelligent enough to defend themselves, but the actual content of their legal beliefs gets in the way of their defense. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
Both place their faith in the state, and in the community, to be sure. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:27 pm
BS131347), March 2, 2014, p. 99, citing Neighbors for Smart Rail v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:27 pm
BS131347), March 2, 2014, p. 99, citing Neighbors for Smart Rail v. [read post]
25 Sep 2021, 9:17 am
Case citation: Cohoon v. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 6:23 am
Posner’s argument — that there are “countless” exceptions to the First Amendment and it’s perfectly natural to make more — is exactly the government’s we-should-have-power-to-censor argument that the Supreme Court flatly rejected in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 2:29 pm
By Eric Goldman Young v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:33 am
Chief Judge Kozinzki from the Ninth Circuit, dissenting from denial of a motion for en banc hearing in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 8:12 pm
If their elected officials are smart, they’ll send President V. this message: Let property owners determine “just compensation. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 2:02 pm
I've previously waxed poetic about how the California Supreme Court is really smart, often unanimous, blah blah blah. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 10:58 am
Powerbahn, LLC v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 1:16 pm
See United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 5:15 am
U.S. v. [read post]
