Search for: "State v. Soft" Results 421 - 440 of 1,434
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2018, 12:11 pm by William Ford
The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 8:52 pm
  This approach is both profound and profoundly relevant to the actual state of contemporary regulatory governance in which states remain powerful but not the singular regulatory actors within the structures of global production. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 8:27 am
It is the combination of the ‘re-emergence of the state’ from out of the shadows of multilateralism and international governance, a growing discontent and backlash from multiple sectors of society directed against existing international norms and institutions and the limited ability of the latter to address serious contemporary problems, which generate a sense of crisis and a possible plunge towards world disorder (Although, it may also be claimed that… [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 4:26 pm by Adam Thimmesch
By Adam Thimmesch As I’ve previously blogged, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in South Dakota v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 4:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  ************************************************* In 2012, the Federal Court of Australia’s decision in ASIC v Healey sent shockwaves through the boardrooms of large Australian companies and beyond. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Instead of veering towards such a transformation, the government decided to rely once again on its preferred model, stimulating growth through investment, exports and subsidies to state-owned enterprises (SOEs), operating outside of China on a regional scale, via BRI. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 4:09 pm by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
  But the biggest fear was realized in United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 5:10 am by William Ford
Julia Solomon-Strauss and Stephen Szrom discussed the latest developments in United States v. al-Nashiri. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
In the recent case (Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:32 am by Laura Jehl and Stephanie Malaska
While the order concluded that the summons satisfied a “legitimate purpose” and (mostly) sought “information relevant to that purpose” under the Powell test (United States v. [read post]