Search for: "State v. Sour"
Results 421 - 440
of 466
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WIPO review of UDRP disputes - record number of complaints handled by WIPO in 2008 (WIPO) (Out-Law) (Michael Geist) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Class 46) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Law360) Goverment outlines new creative industries’ Digital Rights Agency proposed in Digital Britain report (Out-Law) (IP finance) (Intellectual… [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 6:51 am
Third, it doesn't even involve a positional conflict - the son's representation of Medtronic apparently was limited to business advice (mergers and intellectual property, according to the article).If this toxic mixture of crocodile tears and sour grapes goes anywhere, we might as well just set a rule that none of a federal (or state, there doesn't seem to be any ethical difference) judge's relatives can practice law. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 9:40 am
V. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 8:04 pm
In Harvey v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 6:45 am
Stanford student David Muraskin previews the first case to be heard this morning, Montejo v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 1:00 pm
You might think we'd start with the top ten, but that would mean closing out the year on a very sour note. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 11:23 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 6:07 am
When the economy sours, unhappy couples often stay together out of financial necessity. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 11:30 am
The Delaware case is R&R Capital, LLC v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 4:28 pm
Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 4:02 pm
Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:12 pm
State, 809 A.2d 77 (N.J. 2002); Landrigan v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 2:26 pm
Collectively, they make a compelling case for change.In Shaw v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 1:41 pm
Campbell v. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 9:18 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 9:54 am
Contractual Obligation Productions, LLC v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 4:30 am
Finally, the December 2007 Marciano decision makes a cameo appearance in the New York Court of Appeals' controversial February 2008 decision in Tzolis v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 10:45 am
"That really soured the relationship. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 7:02 am
Rick Kittel and KU Defender Project student Amy Hall won in State v. [read post]
