Search for: "State v. South"
Results 421 - 440
of 12,086
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2015, 4:18 pm
On 19 January 2015, the Constitutional Court of South Africa handed down judgment in the case of Democratic Alliance v African National Congress and Another ([2015] ZACC 1), a case concerning text text messages relating to President Jacob Zuma sent to over 1.5 million voters by the Democratic Alliance (DA) in the run up to the 2014 general elections. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
Not only that, but it refused to acknowledge the ruling by the South Carolina Supreme Court in 2009 in All Saints Waccamaw Parish v. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 4:58 am
Following the Jackson Women’s Health Organization v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:41 am
Town of South Kingstown. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:02 am
Brennan, holding that the RIAA complaint fails to state a claim.February 25, 2008, Letter of Ray Beckerman to Hon. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 4:20 am
§ 802(44) is the exclusive definition of the term "felony drug offense" in § 841(b)(1)(A); under that definition, a state drug offense punishable by more than one year qualifies as a felony drug offense, even if the state law classifies the offense as a misdemeanor. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 7:59 am
Map of South Dakota highlighting Union County (Photo credit: Wikipedia)United States District Court for the District of South Dakota Judge Karen Schreier will hear arguments from Beef Products, Inc (BPI) seeking to remand its $1.2 billion defamation suit against ABC News to state court, Reuters wire service reported.The case, Beef Products Inc. et al. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 1:29 pm
The South Carolina Supreme Court recently in the case of Williams v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 2:20 am
Stated differently, the consumer has only suffered an economic loss. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 8:03 am
United States, Matheson v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 4:20 am
In Hutterville Hutterian Brethren, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 1:12 am
" The Court then set out to examine punitives awarded in comparable cases.Examining South Carolina cases involving insurance company bad faith, as well as applying the tenets of State Farm v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 5:13 am
ComerBelow is a case brief of the South Carolina Supreme Court's August 16, 2010 decision in Branham v. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:23 am
The complaint (full text) in Maddonna v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 7:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:08 am
Risperdal is different from other antipsychotic medicines and “doctors needed to know that,” he added.Jurors will begin deliberating the case tomorrow.The case is State of South Carolina v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 8:00 am
State of Georgia. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 7:38 pm
Specifically, the defendant's lawyer relied on Veith v. [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 2:55 am
In Atlantic v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 5:55 pm
John Nichols wrote a great article for The South Carolina Lawyer Bulletin for Spring 2008 discussing the admissibility of expert's opinions pursuant to Rule 702, and the lack of necessity for South Carolina to adopt the federal standard described as Daubert for the infamous 1993 decision Daubert v. [read post]
