Search for: "State v. State Board of Equalization" Results 421 - 440 of 4,219
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2013, 10:33 am by The Federalist Society
Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, concerning whether a state amending its constitution to prevent race or sex-based discrimination or preferential treatment in the admissions decisions of its public universities violates the Equal Protection Clause, and National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 2:09 pm
The following post is part of a Discussion Board about today’s decision in Medellin v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 6:46 pm by Russell Knight
Illinois State Board of Elections, 161 Ill.2d 502, 510, 204 Ill.Dec. 301, 641 N.E.2d 525 (1994). [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 12:43 pm by becassidy
Supreme Court Landmark Cases – Separate but equal cases: Plessy v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 3:22 pm by NARF
State of Alaska, Dept. of Health & Social Serivces, Office of Children's Services (Indian Child Welfare Act) State of Oklahoma v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 6:26 pm
See the court decision: JOHN DOE -v- THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE; STATE POLICE COMMISSIONER JEFFREY B. [read post]
14 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
For example, conservative jurists in cases like Town of Greece v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 10:17 am by Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently allowed a “patronage capital” lawsuit to continue in federal court after deciding federal loan conditions and requirements may preempt state laws.[1] One of the agencies within the United States Department of Agriculture is the Rural Utilities Service (RUS). [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:53 am by Patricia Salkin
However, as the Town’s Planning Board finished its SEQRA review, a subset of the Villages Defendants filed a lawsuit in New York state court to challenge the ASHL and the Town Planning Board’s SEQRA analysis. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:47 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
Wider Implications The proceedings in Hook v British Airways and Stott v Thomas Cook have already attracted significant attention from the Equality and Human Rights Commission; with the Secretary of State acting as a further intervener. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 10:40 am
The Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court, in Zehl v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
A reader posted a comment asking whether I could put up additional  material from Yabsley v. [read post]