Search for: "State v. Straw" Results 421 - 440 of 625
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2019, 5:20 am
, Chandler v Cape plc [2012] EWCA Civ 525.Tort, however, can be understood in two senses here. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/IYshH2yBdc -> Failed $4.4 billion bid for Nortel patents comes back to haunt Google and friends on Halloween http://t.co/dHv1GVvyGq -> How to account for exploitation of a recording Straw & Anor v Jennings & Ors [2013] EWHC 3290 (Ch) (01 November 2013) http://t.co/yuBcJDnGsy -> Is Antigua the puurrrrrrfect home for the CopyKat? [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 9:09 am by Eugene Volokh
Hadley, 431 F.3d 484, 507 (6th Cir. 2005), and United States v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 2:00 am by Rachit Buch
In MGN v United Kingdom, on balancing Article 8 and 10 rights, the Strasbourg Court stated (§142): The balancing of individual interests, which may well be contradictory, is a difficult matter and Contracting States must have a broad margin of appreciation in this respect since the national authorities are in principle better placed than this Court to assess whether or not there is a “pressing social need” capable of justifying an interference with one of… [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:02 am by Melina Padron
The witnesses interviewed were Jack Straw MP, Lord Wakeham, Sir Stephen Sedley, and Professor Gavin Phillipson. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Catherine Morris
Heller) and 23 June 2022 (New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 1:57 am
So a judge in Allegheny county, in Clifton v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 12:22 am
The PTO pulled a shenanigan that left applicants sometimes holding the short straw. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
The subsequent Federal Circuit decision in Leapfrog confirms that assessment.The danger that Epstein sees, especially to the pharmaceutical industry, is a straw man:"It is no wonder that the pharmaceutical companies dread the PRA, because of its potential to slash their returns while increasing their costs. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm by Kelly
KG v OHIM (IPKat) AG supports AB InBev’s case in BUD appeal: Anheuser-Busch v Bud? [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:37 pm by charonqc
As can be shown from Hirst v UK (No2), the Separation of Powers is ineffective. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 5:35 pm by Richard Hunt
Early last month the Department of Justice filed a “Statement of Interest” in Migyanko v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 5:36 pm
Some of the critics thought that we were either ignorant or intentionally playing dumb about whether drug companies could be "state actors" for constitutional purposes. [read post]