Search for: "State v. Sullivan"
Results 421 - 440
of 2,473
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2015, 4:05 am
Plaintiff Sullivan Farms II, Inc. has stated plausible claims for relief under § 1983, § 1985, and the FHA ... [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 3:35 am
” United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 1:52 pm
In Sullivan v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 12:05 pm
Regards, Roy] Sullivan v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 6:23 am
On March 26, 2015, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decided Sullivan v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 6:23 am
On March 26, 2015, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decided Sullivan v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:56 am
The case, Sullivan v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 10:53 am
Court Ruling This issue was discussed in the California Supreme Court case of Sullivan v. [read post]
18 Sep 2021, 6:39 am
United States defamation law has made it famously difficult for claimants to win their cases. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
On April 3, 2023, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) issued a policy statement regarding what constitutes an “abusive” act or practice (the “Policy Statement”).[1] The Policy Statement outlines the CFPB’s approach to analyzing whether an act or practice may be abusive and provides examples, which the Policy Statement also notes may be used by state attorneys general or other agencies that are authorized to enforce the prohibition… [read post]
23 May 2010, 7:24 am
To the case page for United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 5:25 am
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use: Gitto v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 6:31 pm
The case, Baker v. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 12:10 pm
Real property — Foreclosure sale — Timeliness of exceptions A homeowner filed exceptions to a foreclosure sale more than 30 days after the clerk had issued a notice stating that the sale would be ratified unless cause to the contrary were shown within 30 days after the date of the notice. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 12:16 pm
Sullivan v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 4:45 am
Financial investment data concerning public official's spouse subject to disclosure pursuant to the Freedom of Information LawMatter of Humane Socy. of United States v Fanslau, 2008 NY Slip Op 06681, Decided on August 28, 2008, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentIn Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562, the Court of Appeals said that there is a presumption that all government and agency records are open for public inspection unless the agency… [read post]
17 May 2010, 10:29 am
The Supreme Court released its opinion today in Graham v. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 5:00 am
In the case of Higgins v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 1:30 pm
In Sullivan v. [read post]
