Search for: "State v. Sweet"
Results 421 - 440
of 982
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2014, 1:49 pm
See Fireside Bank v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 3:22 am
In 2008, the tribunal in Continental Casualty v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 2:25 am
This is what the General Court concluded, referring to Case T-418/07 LIBRO v OHIM – Causley (LiBRO), and confirming the approach adopted in Specsavers. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 10:00 am
In Figy v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 12:23 pm
Well, if plaintiffs in Thornton v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
Bauman v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 12:27 pm
Sweet v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 3:04 am
A Manhattan appellate panel’s decision last month in Akasa Holdings, LLC v Sweet, 2014 NY Slip Op 01822 [1st Dept Mar. 20, 2014], illustrates another kind of co-op shareholder dispute involving a battle for board control of a four-unit co-op, pitting one tenant-shareholder owning a majority of the voting shares against the other three tenant-shareholders. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
The district court’s express preemption ruling in Simoneau v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 2:18 pm
(2011), Defamation Primer (2009), and When is a Tweet Not So Sweet? [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 7:00 am
Recently, in Aaron v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 10:56 am
To be sure, he also cites one Pennsylvania case--Barium Steel Corp. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 7:21 pm
It goes down from there: by the team you reach the Sweet Sixteen, the favorites only win 61% of the time. 4. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 5:40 am
The Marcus order is short and sweet, but it sure grabbed our attention. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:19 am
Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp & Others, a Chancery Division, England and Wales, ruling last week from Mr Justice Nugee [don't ask: the Kats haven't come across him either, but he is a Chancery judge], addressed an important preliminary issue. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am
. ____ Q: What is the name of the wood pavement patentee in City of Elizabeth v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 2:14 pm
State, A Brief History of the Netherlands p. 37). [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:04 am
’Following a short and sweet [for Rolex and, by implication, IP rights owners of all shapes and sizes] analysis consisting of just 13 paragraphs, the CJEU ruled as follows:Council Regulation ... 1383/2003 ... [read post]
