Search for: "State v. Trader" Results 421 - 440 of 854
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2012, 4:14 pm by Tyler Giannini and Susan Farbstein
The young United States did not wish to harbor a pirate or slave trader considered the enemy of all mankind. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 1:03 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12-14 January 2016. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 4:54 am
The judgment in Myerson v Myerson [2009] EWCA Civ 282 has captured the headlines around the world (see, for example, here and here), but did the decision come as any surprise? [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 9:55 pm
[S]implified procedures are not yet effectively controlled in the majority of the audited Member States. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:43 pm by Lisa McElroy
Finally, the Court also issued its opinion in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 11:20 pm by David Hart QC
In order to attain the objective of rapidity pursued by that directive, Member States may impose limitation periods for actions in order to require traders to challenge promptly preliminary measures or interim decisions taken in public procurement procedures. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 9:31 pm by Patrick S. O'Donnell
While we’re on the subject of alcohol and rational deliberation (presuming at least a process of ‘democratic deliberation within’ before casting one’s vote), Elster also notes that in Tanner v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:56 pm by Riana Harvey
The opposition relied on Article 8(4) EUTMR, stating that it was entitled under the applicable law in the UK to prevent the use of the mark applied for by means of ‘extended’ passing off (a concept that shall be elaborated on below). [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 6:46 am by Leland E. Beck
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia last week struck down the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)’s Position Limits for Futures and Swaps final rule and interim final rule in International Swaps and Derivatives Association v. [read post]