Search for: "State v. Trader"
Results 421 - 440
of 854
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2013, 6:00 am
By Shira Zucker This August, Judge Amos Mazzant of the United States District Court of the Eastern District of Texas ruled in SEC v. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 9:31 pm
While we’re on the subject of alcohol and rational deliberation (presuming at least a process of ‘democratic deliberation within’ before casting one’s vote), Elster also notes that in Tanner v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 4:33 am
Frost Products Ltd v F C Frost Ltd [2013] EWPCC 34 (Patents County Court, England and Wales) is a decision of Mr Justice Vos from 26 July 2013. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 9:36 pm
The Entity-Level Requirements under Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act and the Commission’s regulations promulgated thereunder relate to: (i) capital adequacy; (ii) chief compliance officer; (iii) risk management; (iv) swap data recordkeeping; (v) swap data repository reporting (“SDR Reporting”); and (vi) physical commodity large swaps trader reporting (“Large Trader Reporting”).The guidance divides these requirements into two categories. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 8:30 am
What is the European Commission's position, she wonders on the likelihood of having to pay twice and its impact on traders and consumers within the Single Market?]". [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 6:25 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 5:45 am
Baxter: PTO Reexamination Decision Trumps Prior Decisions by the Federal Circuit http://t.co/i0NyO2l36t -> State AGs blast Google over YouTube ads for illicit products http://t.co/uSJ9k0zQeP -> Google Glass privacy concerns persist in Congress http://t.co/YDvZStJm7t -> State AGs say Google profits from harmful YouTube videosr http://t.co/XfUml6hzrR -> Apple sued over Siri in patent case in China http://t.co/QkVMRNgcO9 -> No Takedown and Staydown in France… [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 11:00 am
(hereinafter Applicant) v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:53 am
One trader’s gain will necessarily be another trader’s loss. [read post]
31 May 2013, 7:57 am
SEC v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 7:57 am
SEC v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 7:24 am
The former provision prevents the registration of non-distinctive signs, which cannot fulfil the essential function of a trade mark; the latter ensures that 'descriptive signs relating to one or more characteristics of the goods or services in respect of which registration as a mark is sought may be freely used by all traders offering such goods or services' (see Case C‑173/04 P Deutsche SiSi-Werke v OHIM, and Case C‑191/01 P OHIM v Wrigley). [read post]
24 May 2013, 10:09 am
First Derivative Traders, 131 S. [read post]
11 May 2013, 10:35 pm
The Hon’ble Single Judge of the Delhi High Court relied primarily on two decisions with regard to comparative advertising - De Beers Abrasive v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 8:00 am
First Derivative Traders, 131 S. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 2:38 pm
Gallo Winery v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:14 am
Leading scholar developed the idea of TMs as emanation of personality, individualizing the trader. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:13 am
Playing with reality v. paper rights to compromise reflecting different systems. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:30 pm
In Hunter v. [read post]
