Search for: "State v. Wales"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,631
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Defamation Act 2013: A summary and overview six years on, Part 1, Sections 1 to 3 – Brett Wilson LLP
28 Jan 2020, 4:39 pm
The Act stipulated that the courts of England and Wales do not have jurisdiction to hear defamation actions against persons domiciled outside the UK, EU or Lugano Convention, unless satisfied that this is clearly the most appropriate place to bring the action (with a view to preventing so-called ‘libel tourism’). [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
As Roncarelli v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 11:29 pm
The impact of Huawei v ZTE Since the seminal 2015 CJEU case of Huawei v ZTE (the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) (Case C-170/13 Huawei Technologies, EU:C:2015:477)) the importance of a harmonised approach to FRAND across EU member states has become obvious. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 11:17 am
Ltd v Aiwa Corp. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm
United States New York state’s highest court will consider whether U.S. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 4:28 am
And further dispute arose between Sheeran's song 'Photograph' (also written by the first and third claimants; Sheeran and McDaid) and a song called 'Amazing', following which there was a settlement agreement and 35% of the PRS royalties now go to the writers of 'Amazing'.Naturally, the Claimants sought to strike out these allegations, which came before Deputy Master Jefferis on 4 June 2019 on the basis that similar fact evidence is only admissible in civil… [read post]
4 Jan 2020, 4:48 pm
” Google LLC v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 6:58 am
Voller v Nationwide News Pty Ltd; [2019] NSWSC 766 The New South Wales Supreme Court found that social media companies could be considered publishers of comments left by third party users on public Facebook pages. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
He gave Article 23 DPD a very narrow reading, contrary to CJEU decisions such as Case C–168/00 Leitner v TUI Deutschland GmbH [2002] ECR I–1631 (ECLI:EU:C:2002:163; ECJ, 12 March 2002), which held that compensation for “damage” must include both material and non-material damage, that is, both actual damage and distress (see also Case C-63/09 Walz v Clickair SA [2010] ECR I 4239 (ECLI:EU:C:2010:251; CJEU, 6 May 2010); Case… [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 10:17 am
Requirements to be met by the claimant and pre-action correspondence In the aftermath of the VW-Porsche takeover battle, an investor based on the Cayman Islands announced to sue Porsche SE in the High Court of England and Wales. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 1:28 am
News Group Newspapers (The Sun’s publisher, NGN) was, of course, the unsuccessful defendant in the Supreme Court case of PJS v NGN [2016] UKSC 26, [2016] 4 All ER 554 in which the claimant sought an injunction to restrain publication in England and Wales of private information that had already been published in several other jurisdictions. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 12:00 pm
They raise issues as diverse as class, colonialism, familial dynamics, expectations and obligations, mental health, and the proper roles of the legal profession and the welfare state. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 10:39 am
| Feilin v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
EU member states have rejected a draft of the ePrivacy Regulation. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 4:18 pm
As Julian Knowles J stated, Part 11 is concerned with issues of personal jurisdiction, such as whether a claim form has been served properly. [read post]
16 Nov 2019, 7:53 am
Decisions this Week United StatesSpeech First, INC. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:13 pm
Patricia Schmitz v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:43 am
Permakat Eleonora Rosati wrote about Warner Music and Another v TuneIn Inc, an important High Court of England and Wales "test case" about infringement of copyright in sound recordings under section 20 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 11:18 am
She stated in the applications that the subject properties did not have any gas appliances so that no gas safety certificate needed to be included. [read post]
