Search for: "Stevens v. Marks"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,537
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2015, 7:31 pm
-Steven Silverberg [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 4:19 am
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie observes that Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 4:10 am
For The Economist, Steven Mazie reports that during oral argument in this week’s two partisan-gerrymandering cases, Rucho v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:27 am
First on the agenda is Abbott v. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 6:51 am
Mauro talks about Mark Lemley's change of sides: In another sign of the legal community's ambivalence about the case, Stanford Law School professor and leading patent scholar Mark Lemley, in effect, switched sides. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:46 am
Gutierrez and Holder v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 4:15 am
It is undisputed that on March 12, 2012, plantiff Steven M. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 8:54 am
See Marks v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 12:57 pm
An attorney for Sprint, Steven Sunshine, an antitrust practice leader with Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, said Sprint does have a private right to sue. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 5:31 am
The Court’s decision in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:40 am
Staff picks are marked by asterisks. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 8:51 am
Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Mark W. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 12:02 am
Schill, Maffezini v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 10:08 am
He voted in the direction opposite to Stevens’ most often, with five such instances. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 9:25 am
v=WzVwNTSC6ac. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 4:26 am
Another look at Weyerhaeuser comes from Mark Miller at the Federalist Society Review. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:35 am
” (i.e., Brown v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 1:20 pm
Mark Riojas, No. 98,196 (Sedgwick)Direct appeal; First degree murderShawn E. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 4:09 am
” Briefly: In the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh reports on two redistricting cases set to be argued next week, McCrory v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 3:35 pm
A high court majority rejected Johnson's application for a stay of execution and his petition for review in which he raised the Eighth Amendment challenge.Justice John Paul Stevens, joined by Justice Stephen Breyer, dissented, saying Johnson’s situation was “as compelling a case” as he had encountered raising the constitutional concerns that Stevens himself raised in a 1995 dissent from another denial of certiorari: Lackey v. [read post]
