Search for: "Still v. Justice Court"
Results 421 - 440
of 20,226
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2018, 9:50 am
The justices once again did not act on Azar v. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 12:01 am
The concept was first articulated by Justice William Douglas (a Roosevelt nominee) in Griswold v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 11:23 pm
(We still miss Judge Merritt). [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 11:07 am
After years of going back and forth to the Supreme Court over litigation in Fisher v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 6:22 am
The Supreme Court brought a surprising amount of attention to the second argument yesterday morning, in Georgia v Public.Resource.Org. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 2:30 am
In the 1832 case Worchester v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:14 am
And perhaps the cases still to come will evince more tension among the justices. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 10:25 am
Yet when the Supreme Court heard Bowers v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 12:17 pm
California's answer -- reflected in Justice Duarte's opinion -- is that only once you've filed an answer can the trial court "really" determine where the convenience of witnesses exists. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 8:44 am
The ghost of Justice Byron White was manifest in the courtroom on Wednesday as the Justices heard arguments in Wellness International Network v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 11:26 am
Justice Breyer with opinion in Lorenzo v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 10:46 am
My observations about the Supreme Court’s 2.5 hour long (and very tedious) oral arguments in the Taamneh v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:44 pm
In the court case Hiibel v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 3:00 am
Justice Alito dissented, joined by Justices Thomas and Gorsuch. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 11:28 am
Two months later, the justices announced that they would also review the Maryland case, known in the Supreme Court as Benisek v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 12:44 pm
Justice McEwan distinguished a Manitoba Court of Appeal case Fast v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:25 pm
The case was Cullen v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 1:58 pm
Sixteen years later, in his dissent in Bush v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 10:02 am
The justices once again did not act on Azar v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:30 am
From Marbury v. [read post]
