Search for: "Sue Neil" Results 421 - 440 of 605
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2014, 12:50 pm
comes this link to "New Balance sues Converse over trademark actions", the tale of a legal action brought by New Balance on the basis that Converse was being a bit over-vigorous in its efforts to protect the latter's Chuck Taylor All-Star sneakers. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
The conference, co-chaired by its architects Neil J. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 3:50 am
In the event it was the latter who prevailed.Turning to s 43(1) of the Lanham Act, Neil showed how far it protects unregistered marks and trade dress, sending out a message that trade marks are liked, plaintiffs are welcomed -- with just one downside: it doesn't offer any opportunities for injured consumers to sue [citing the recent Neil-Jeremy Katpost on the consumer protection of trade marks, here]. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
Where is the troll phenomenon going, reflects Neil? [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:03 am
 Starting from the final chart of The Economist’s Innovation Awards, published in the 4 October issue of the magazine, Neil reflects on the criteria used to choose the winners, on the very state of innovation, and on what that concept means nowadays. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 11:41 am by Steven Calabresi
… In our view, it is improper for the federal courts to entertain a claim by a plaintiff whose standing to sue is founded on family law rights ***. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:03 am
Though far back in time, those works of fine cartography were submitted to a secrecy regime and some of them had their pirated copies, Neil explains in this delightful piece bridging past and future of IP.* AIPPI Report: The emerging role of IP business financeAnnsley leaves the floor to her colleague Chandni Sood, who reports from the first post-Congress AIPPI [on which see the enriched series of posts that the Amerikat and her team provided last week here] event in the UK. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 12:58 am by INFORRM
We’ve always assumed that the law of passing off would protect people, but you can only sue for passing off if you’ve got a trading reputation, so it doesn’t protect the ordinary person from the use of their image. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Quinn, of Lavin, O’Neil, Cedrone & DiSipio, represented Ms. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:06 am
Neil examines the extent to which commercially successful creative content can be managed. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 9:33 am
"The IPKat will continue to monitor the situation, rather suspecting that trade mark expert, American sports-lover and blog team member Neil will feel tempted to write something on it when the moment is ripe.Another curiosity from the United States may be perused in this Daily Mail article, "New Jersey sues Florida pizza shop 1,300 miles away because logo is 'too similar' to Garden State Parkway", via a tip-off from Chris Torrero… [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 3:09 pm by Associated Press
Five former NFL players, including six-time Pro Bowl defensive end Neil Smith, are suing the union for not providing accurate information about the risk of head injuries. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 9:29 am
This is the result of the foreclosure bill last summer drastically dropping the number of years for a mortgage company to sue for a deficiency from five years to only one year. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:12 am by John Mikhail
On November 3, 1790, the Virginia House of Delegates adopted a resolution condemning Secretary of Treasury Alexander Hamilton’s Funding Act of 1790. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 11:15 am
Only one person really understands it, and that's fellow Kat Neil -- and even he isn't so sure about what it actually means]. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 2:16 am by Ben
 A statement from Warner's attorneys also notes "[Eligible artists] who want to keep the right to sue Warner Music Group must exclude themselves from [this] settlement by 31 May 2014. [read post]