Search for: "Sullivan v. State Bar" Results 421 - 440 of 488
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2014, 6:31 am by Amy Howe
  Moreover, he maintains, the Supreme Court’s case law on this question is unsettled:  although the Court in Sullivan v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm by John Elwood
United States, 14-150; potential blockbuster Friedrichs v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:11 am by Jim Sedor
Senate races in the country: an endangered Democratic incumbent, Mark Begich, against Republican challenger, Dan Sullivan, a former state attorney general and natural resources commissioner. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:47 am by Dennis Crouch
AIPLA Peter Sullivan of Foley Hoag filed the AIPLA brief. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:35 pm by Jack Sharman
  Brendan Sullivan’s virulent, scorched-earth defense of Oliver North during the televised Iran/Contra hearings is the exception that proves the rule: in addition to the fact that Colonel North as a client offered his lawyers advantages and disadvantages peculiar only to Colonel North, Sullivan made a considered tactical decision that high-profile aggression was the appropriate tack in that particular public theater. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 5:36 am
In light of this recent federal enactment, multiple state laws to the same effect, and even public opinion polls suggesting support for the death penalty in such cases, was the Court's decision in Kennedy v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Perhaps the company can show that (1) it can design a system that can perform at nearly the 90th percentile on the bar exam,[8] but that (2) checking the system's output to see if it includes a particular person's name in an assertion about an embezzlement conviction is beyond the company's powers. [read post]
30 May 2024, 10:50 am by Amy Howe
Sullivan for analyzing claims that the government has unconstitutionally coerced someone to violate someone else’s First Amendment rights. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
Consequently, the court barred the EEOC from seeking relief on behalf of the 67 allegedly aggrieved persons. [read post]