Search for: "Sweden v State" Results 421 - 440 of 752
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2012, 3:39 pm
461/10 Bonnier Audio AB, Earbooks AB, Norstedts Förlagsgrupp AB, Piratförlaget AB, Storyside AB v Perfect Communication Sweden AB, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen, Sweden. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  (I’m not sure this is true, as a property teacher who recently taught State v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:46 am by Daniel West, Olswang LLP
It is however an established principle of Strasbourg jurisprudence that such a right does not extend so far as to impose a positive obligation on public authorities to disclose or distribute information (see Leander v Sweden (1987) 9 EHRR 433 or Roche v United Kingdom (2005) 42 EHRR 599). [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:15 am
It goes like this:"In Case C-461/10 Bonnier Audio AB v Perfect Communication Sweden AB the Högsta domstolen in Sweden referred the following questions to the CJEU for a preliminary ruling:"1. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 2:59 am by INFORRM
Sweden,…) and that “it is difficult to derive from the Convention a general right of access to administrative data and documents” (Loiseau v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 5:29 pm by David Hart QC
Sweden,…) and that “it is difficult to derive from the Convention a general right of access to administrative data and documents” (Loiseau v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 6:07 pm
If it starts with a 2, the it is from Canada...3 is from Mexico,...and, etc. 1 = USA 2 = Canada 3 = Mexico 4 = USA 5 = Brazil J = Japan K = Korea L = Thailand S = Great Britain V = France or Yugoslavia W = Germany Y = Sweden or Finland Z = Italy [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 3:30 pm by Rachit Buch
The Court reiterated a number of principles: that A1P1 protects current possessions, not an entitlement to future ones (Marckx v Belgium para 50); that a professional’s business clientele could amount to a possession (Van Marle); that revocation of a license or permit may be an interference with a possession (Fredin v Sweden); and that goodwill may be an element in the valuation of a professional license (paras 88-93). [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 3:16 pm by Karwan Eskerie
Vejdeland and Others v Sweden (Application no. 1813/07) – Read judgment  “Will both teacher and pupils simply become the next victims of the tyranny of tolerance, heretics, whose dissent from state-imposed orthodoxy must be crushed at all costs? [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 12:12 pm by Veronika Gaertner
Going beyond the borders of the State in which a business has its seat is the foundation for a rebutable presumption that the business directs its activities to the consumer’s State. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:27 am by Rosalind English
The Court’s reasoning This was not a question of ignoring the “strong presumption” that the procedures of other Convention States complied with Article 6, as indicated by Lindberg v Sweden (Admissibility) (48198/99) (2004) 38 E.H.R.R. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm by INFORRM
The group’s e-petition calls on the Ministry of Justice to “leave FoI alone”, stating, “the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOI) has exposed the scandal of MPs’ expenses, and many examples of waste and improper behaviour by public authorities, politicians and public officials. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 1:00 am by INFORRM
This has recently been developed from an understanding of the right as being a relatively narrow one, which is to do with receiving information that others are willing to impart (found in Leander v Sweden (1987) EHRR 43), to a relatively broad one, which now encompasses receiving information held by an organ of the state, free of unjustified administrative obstacles (found in Tarsasag a Szabadsagjogokert v Hungary (2009) ECHR 618 and Kenedi v Hungary… [read post]