Search for: "Sweep v. Sweep"
Results 421 - 440
of 5,468
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2023, 7:53 am
V. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Google and Twitter v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 11:34 am
Tuition Org. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:30 pm
ShareTuesday’s argument in Lora v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
This summary must include (i) the person or persons affected; (ii) the date the incident was discovered and whether it is ongoing; (iii) whether any data was stolen, altered, accessed or used for any unauthorized purpose; (iv) the effect of the incident on the entity’s operations; and (v) whether the incident has been remediated or is currently being remediated. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 9:35 am
In 1952, the court held in Steele v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 5:00 am
And when the homeowner made a motion for summary judgment (seeking pre-trial relief in his favor), the Nassau County Supreme Court granted that dismissal request.Since the mat wasn’t a “dangerous or defective condition,” and the homeowner was able to show that it maintained the property in “reasonably safe condition,” and because A.V. wasn’t able to competently rebut those contentions, the Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed the underlying dismissal.No… [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 8:53 am
To that end, "state colleges and universities are not enclaves immune from the sweep of the First Amendment. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:20 am
On Monday, in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:18 am
Sackett v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 2:45 pm
., v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 2:45 pm
., v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 12:49 pm
From today's Ninth Circuit decision in Yim v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 5:50 am
In the new case, Dunn v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 4:40 am
According to the court: “[W]e do not accept the proposition that the ubiquity of cell phones, standing alone, can justify a sweeping search for such a device. . . [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 10:21 am
In Abitron Austria GmbH v. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 9:21 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Upjohn v. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 4:29 am
James, provides a prime example of the broad sweep of these laws. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 11:57 am
From Judge Don Willett's opinion yesterday in Fisher v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 8:25 am
The NPRM asked for input on its sweeping proposed rule, but it also asked for input on possible regulatory alternatives. [read post]
