Search for: "TEXAS v. NEW MEXICO"
Results 421 - 440
of 988
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2018, 5:32 am
New Mexico and Colorado. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
University of Texas at Austin. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:05 am
Lyle reports that the Court has also asked for the views of the Solicitor General regarding a complaint filed directly with the Court by the state of Texas against the state of New Mexico under the Court’s original jurisdiction; the complaint involves a dispute over the states’ competing rights to the waters of the Rio Grande River. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:56 pm
Espinoza, 826 F.2d 317, 319 (5th Cir. 1987) (quoting Texas v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 8:44 am
Georgia and Texas v. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 6:35 am
In his opinion in State of New Mexico v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 4:21 am
Felix to review a lower-court decision “that ordered a New Mexico city to remove a Ten Commandments monument from the lawn outside City Hall. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
The case arose in July 2004, when Cuellar was driving toward Mexico, when his car was stopped by a deputy sheriff near Eldorado, Texas. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:47 am
Circuit Opinion in Atchley v. [read post]
23 May 2010, 11:36 pm
(Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Plaintiff on liability; defense on damages - Commil v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 12:20 pm
The NCIB investigated the theft and found that the Escalade had been recovered in New Mexico. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
People from Texas can go to New Mexico. [read post]
23 May 2010, 12:36 pm
A last detail is that an Impact factory is in Roswell, New Mexico. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 5:03 am
From Apodaca-Fisk v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Palin v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 11:44 am
The Tennessee case of Maddy v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:18 am
New Mexico and Colorado, one of two original-jurisdiction disputes over water rights the justices heard last week. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 9:47 am
Texas (April 26): Whether the Department of Homeland Security must continue to enforce the Migrant Protection Protocols, a policy begun by President Donald Trump that requires asylum seekers at the southern border to stay in Mexico while awaiting a hearing in U.S. immigration court. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 6:37 am
The remaining plaintiffs are citizens of Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Louisiana, Montana, New Mexico, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and West Virginia. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 8:00 am
This issue came up in the case, American Home Assurance Company v. [read post]