Search for: "The Corporation Counsel et al" Results 421 - 440 of 1,027
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2016, 11:48 am by Kevin
David John Slater, et al., No. 15-cv-4324-WHO (N.D. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:47 am by Dennis Crouch
 The historical case law they argue was bolstered by the AIA language which states that failure to obtain or introduce evidence of counsel “may not be used to prove that the accused infringer willfully infringed the patent”[5] It is clear from context that this new provision was intended to be a defense against enhanced damages under Section 284. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 8:37 pm by Ron Coleman
Is the Sixth Circuit’s decision in Varsity Brands et al v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:13 am by MBettman
Anthem Cross & Blue Shield Et Al. 2002-Ohio-7113 (In assessing punitive damages and their overarching purpose, “the plaintiff remains a party, but the de facto party is our society, and the jury is determining whether and to what extent we as a society should punish the defendant. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 7:25 am by Podhurst Orseck
Takata Corporation et al., case number 1:14-cv-24009-FAM, in the U.S. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 12:20 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
., et al., holding that FanFest—a five-day interactive baseball theme park organized in conjunction with Major League Baseball’s 2013 All-Star Week and held at the Javits Center in New York City—is an “establishment” for purposes of the FLSA’s seasonal amusement or recreational establishment exemption, 29 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:06 pm by Steven Boutwell
American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company, et al; 158 So.3d 798, 2014-C-0969 c/w 2014-C-0973 (La. 1/28/15). [read post]
Overview The Security Services assessed that during Pham’s trip to Yemen, Al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula trained him as a terrorist and he therefore became a threat to the safety and security of the UK. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
 Ct. 1870 (2009) case, as well as a still pertinent Fourth Circuit precedent (Pnemo Abex Corporation, et al. v. [read post]