Search for: "The United States v. State of Idaho" Results 421 - 440 of 850
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2018, 4:00 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-7793 Issue: Whether 18 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:58 pm by National Indian Law Library
United States (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act)Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 4:45 am by Marcia Coyle
In Moyle, Speaker of the Idaho House of Representatives v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 2:28 pm by Deirdre Schifeling
Similar moves to rig the rules can be seen in Arizona, Florida, Idaho, South Dakota, and Arkansas. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 10:15 pm by Steve Davies
The Sacketts' lot in Priest Lake, Idaho In the brief, docketed with the court Wednesday, Nov. 23, the United States contends that Chantell and Michael Sackett, Idaho landowners who filled a half-acre of wetlands on their Priest Lake property with dirt and rock in preparation for building a home, “have no constitutional right to immediate judicial review” of EPA’s 2007 compliance order requiring them to remove the fill and restore the… [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 9:33 am
The Sixth Circuit affirmed a judgment (including attorney's fees) against a father who claimed that permitting a woman, but not a man, to terminate a pregnancy violates the equal protection clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 9:33 am
The Sixth Circuit affirmed a judgment (including attorney's fees) against a father who claimed that permitting a woman, but not a man, to terminate a pregnancy violates the equal protection clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 10:47 am by Lyle Denniston
This was the first federal appeals court decision to interpret the scope of the Supreme Court’s decision a year ago in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 6:29 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Seal of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 1:50 pm by Amy Howe
United States … to adopt a workable standard for delineating the Act’s reach. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 9:24 am by Maureen Johnston
United States 13-744Issue: Whether a medical professional can be convicted of “knowingly and willfully” making a false statement in medical records or reports under 18 U.S.C. [read post]