Search for: "Thomas, R. v. Thomas, J." Results 421 - 440 of 1,621
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  In considering this question, Marcus Smith J considered the case law regarding the stay of proceedings and, in particular, the Court of Appeals judgment in IPCom v HTC[2]. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 7:10 am by Lovechilde
  That role would go to Justice Breyer, a left-of-center Clinton appointee (notwithstanding that Breyer incomprehensibly joined Clarence Thomas' opinion to provide a 5-3 majority in Utah v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 4:11 am
The Wood case demonstrates an exception to this rule: The power to appoint does not support a claim of the power to remove an incumbent when removal from the position in question is provided for by statute.William J. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 2:53 am by John L. Welch
Thomas McCarthy (Moderator), A Century of Trademark Law - Looking Back and Looking Forward.INTA Amicus Brief in International Hair Cosmetics Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
On 16 June 2023, Andrew Baker J quashed a prisoner governor’s decision to stop a man jailed for murder from talking to a journalist for a podcast about his appeal against conviction, R (Alexander) v Secretary of State for Justice [2023] EWHC 1407 (Admin). [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 7:31 pm by Josh Blackman
Britton, 523 U.S. 574, 611–12 (1998) (Scalia, J., joined by Thomas, J., dissenting). [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 11:12 am by Damin J. Toell, Esq.
I spent much of my law school years (and tapering off thereafter) chewing up books like 'J R' and 'A Frolic of his Own' by William Gaddis (I think I got through the first chapter or two of 'The Recognitions' at one point), most everything by Don DeLillo, Thomas Pynchon's 'V.', most of the core works of Thomas Bernhard (which I guess don't quite qualify as 'big'), and even wannabe fare like… [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 5:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
Rogers v Grewal (2020) (Thomas, J., dissenting); (2) if so, whether intermediate or strict judicial scrutiny applies in this case; and (3) whether the University of Michigan's firearm policy is violative of the Second Amendment, considering among other factors whether this policy reflects historical or traditional firearm restrictions within a university setting and whether it is relevant to consider this policy in light of the University's geographic… [read post]