Search for: "Thomas, in Re" Results 421 - 440 of 8,706
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2007, 1:50 pm
Kauai's newspaper, in a story entitled "Kauai Springs operating for now," reports on a case: "We're in a holding pattern," said Robert Thomas, an attorney with Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert representing Kaua‘i Springs. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 3:48 am
[Refusals to register 8UP and 8UPSPORTS for various clothing items, including t-shirts and sweatshirts, in view of the registered marks shown below, for various clothing items, including t-shirts and sweatshirts [APPAREL and CLOTHING disclaimed].In re Thomas Barton, Serial No. 85826787 (December 11, 2014) [not precedential]. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 10:00 pm
Recently re-elected Senator Craig Thomas has died. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 12:25 pm
Thomas Wuil Joo (University of California - Davis Law School) has posted Yick Wo Re-Revisited: Nonblack Nonwhites and Fourteenth Amendment History (University of Illinois Law Review, Fall 2008) on SSRN. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Stephen Gillers
ShareAfter the oral argument in In re Grand Jury, the smart money would have predicted either that the court would affirm the U.S. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:45 pm by David Oscar Markus
We're isolated from the politics, we're isolated from the city and in a lot of ways we're isolated from the country. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 12:16 pm
  Die Hard, Hunt for Red October, Thomas Crown Affair, Rollerball. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 5:28 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Now, on top of that, they’re getting in trouble for cheating in their appeals. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 10:24 am
June 18, 2009), dealt with the res judicata effect of a 1986 injunction. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:49 am by Glenn Reynolds
IF YOU’RE A REPUBLICAN AND YOU’RE UNHAPPY, YOU CAN CHEER YOURSELF UP by reading this “What if Obama loses” symposium in the Washington Monthly. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 11:53 pm
"When you're struggling, you can't afford to carry that millstone of anger with you. [read post]
16 May 2007, 12:39 am
But the relevant constitutional standard is not, as Thomas submits, that Austin can prove a violation only by showing that Thomas's conduct "shocks the conscience" of the Court. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 6:39 am by John Elwood
Thomas, 10-63, limited to question 2 presented by the petition (question 1 was no longer certworthy after the decision in Walker v. [read post]