Search for: "Thomas v. State of Louisiana"
Results 421 - 440
of 594
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
SCALIA, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which THOMAS, J., joined. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm
Thomas, 10-63, decided on January 18. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In contrast to Smith’s approach, judge-shopping from the start in Missouri v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 8:18 am
In addition to California, the other states with at least a few such prisoners are Delaware, Iowa, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Virginia. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 7:08 pm
See O’Connor v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am
Louisiana, which held that 2012’s Miller v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
Louisiana, 14-6381, (second relist) concerns the retroactivity of Miller v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 2:25 pm
Texas On January 18, 2022, the State of Texas filed a motion to dismiss its claims in Texas v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
By Thomas A. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:36 am
At least Justice Thomas and Justice Alito dissented. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 10:32 am
The plaintiffs were the states of Louisiana and Missouri, and five individuals, including three doctors, a news website publisher, and a health care activist. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 7:04 am
Souter and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
Katz, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Los Angeles 6 $257,679,500 Consumer Protection State of Louisiana v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 7:48 pm
” Ex parte Thomas, No. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 2:24 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
On the assumption that five Supreme Court Justices—Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett—are prepared to overrule Roe v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:38 pm
Justice Thomas delivers another unanimous opinion, in Mussachio v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 3:32 am
He joined a dissent by Kagan in Louisiana v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:30 am
In Espinoza v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
The justices also issued one opinion yesterday: In United States v. [read post]
