Search for: "Tomlinson v. Tomlinson"
Results 421 - 440
of 533
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2011, 3:54 am
See Adam Wagner’s post McCarthy v United Kingdom (Case C? [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:31 am
On the same day, Mr Justice Vos will hear applications in the phone hacking cases of Hoppen v NGN and Miller v NGN. [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:10 am
The jury in the Tomlinson inquest returned a verdict of unlawful killing on Tuesday. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:25 pm
” He also referred to the Flood v Times case, on its way to the Supreme Court. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:47 am
There have also been injunctions granted where both parties to the adulterous relationship have wanted to keep the information private (ETK v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 439), being a prime example). [read post]
3 May 2011, 10:30 pm
Although in Von Hannover v Germany ((2004) 40 EHRR 1) there was an element of harassment, a series of subsequent cases have found violations resulting from [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:35 am
Part 2 – Hugh Tomlinson QC Privacy: the way ahead? [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:31 am
The speakers will be Mark Lewis, Jonathan Coad, Professor Alastair Mullis and Hugh Tomlinson QC. [read post]
2 May 2011, 12:00 am
The trial judges in Campbell v MGN and Douglas v Hello! [read post]
1 May 2011, 12:00 am
The Prime Minister said last week that he was “uneasy” about the development of a privacy law by judges based on the European Convention when this should be a matter for parliament. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:40 pm
([2001] QB 967) Campbell v MGN ([2004] 2 AC 457), McKennitt v Ash ([2008] QB 73), Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers ([2008] 1 QB 103), Murray v Express Newspapers ([2009] Ch 481), Donald v Ntuli ([2010] EWCA Civ 1276) and, most recently, JIH v News Group Newspapers ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:07 pm
The trial judges in Campbell v MGN and Douglas v Hello! [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:18 pm
([2001] QB 967) Campbell v MGN ([2004] 2 AC 457), McKennitt v Ash ([2008] QB 73), Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers ([2008] 1 QB 103), Murray v Express Newspapers ([2009] Ch 481), Donald v Ntuli ([2010] EWCA Civ 1276) and, most recently, JIH v News Group Newspapers ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 5:29 pm
The others were represented by Hugh Tomlinson QC, David Sherborne and Sara Mansoori. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:04 am
Both writers argued in favour of the new single publication rule, which would bury the 160 year old common law authority, Duke of Brunswick v Harmer, that is the basis for the legal interpretation of every download of an online article as a new publication. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 7:15 am
See Terry v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a member of Matrix Chambers and of the Inforrm Committee. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
”[6] (b) Mr Hugh Tomlinson QC: the need for appropriate remedies as well as protection of bloggers If agreement of the kind described by Mr Justice Eady could be reached concerning the applicable law, why not also agreement about applicable remedies? [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
In the oft quoted words of Willes J in East v Holmes ((1858) 1 F&F 347, 349), “If a man wrote that all lawyers were thieves, no particular lawyer could sue him unless there was something to point to the particular individual“ In the leading English case of Knupffer v Express Newspapers ([1944] AC 116) the “Daily Express” published an article referring to “The quislings on whom Hitler flatters himself he can build a pro-German movement within… [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
App. 2001) (holding that sheriff’s deputy was a public official for purposes of defamation action against candidate for office of sheriff), Tomlinson v. [read post]
