Search for: "Tucker, Matter of" Results 421 - 440 of 750
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2015, 10:14 am
But since in-person speech and printing were the most common subjects of suppression, and of debates about constitutional protection, Tucker naturally focused on those two matters.) [read post]
1 May 2015, 11:11 am by Sebastian Brady
Some of that information, Tucker argues, could be the same data which the CISA is helping U.S. companies to share. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 6:34 am by Howard M. Wasserman
Thus, the Tucker Act is unique because of the Court’s prior Tucker Act decisions; it does not control as to similarly worded statutes lacking such prior decisional history. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 9:46 am by The Murray Law Firm
Local News Two people were reportedly shot and injured during a robbery at the Paradise East Apartments in Tucker early Wednesday morning, April 22, 2015. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 12:58 pm by Lyle Denniston
 One of the uncertainties, in fact, is whether this case is actually about only one crop, no matter how important the constitutional issue may be. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
Tucker, 645 F.2d 404, 418 (5th Cir. 1981)  three part operational test for an “investment contract” as a security. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 8:59 am by WIMS
EPA - Fine Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards: State Implementation Plan Requirements; Notice of public hearing and extension of comment period. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
She is currently co-counsel in Morris v NM, in which the lower court found a right of citizens in that state to make this choice as a fundamental constitutional right; the matter is now on appeal. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
On April 26, 2013, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal upheld amendments to the PSESA and ruled that whether or not the Charter protects a right to strike is a matter that should be left to the Supreme Court of Canada to decide. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 12:18 am by Darren Olivier
Tucker and Oken suggest that the ASA should not have dismissed the complaint and used the opportunity to embrace digital advertising. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 5:51 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Maatman, Jr. of Seyfarth Shaw on the firm’s EEOC Year-End Countdown Cyber Monday – December 1, 2014 – Boston lawyer Cynthia LaRose of Mintz Levin on the firm’s blog, Privacy & Security Matters Is Your Website Ready for California’s “Minor Eraser” Law? [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 9:30 am by EEM
(African Arguments Blog, Nov. 2014) [text]- Why a Campaign to End Statelessness Matters (Inst. on Statelessness & Inclusion, Nov. 2014) [text]UNHCR's statelessness research award recipients:- Helen Brunt- Georgetown Law Human Rights Institute Fact-Finding Project- Maria Jose Recalde Vela- Jason Tucker- Caia VlieksWeb site:Stateless Voices [access]- Produces films depicting lives of stateless people in Europe and the U.S.Related posts:- News:… [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 11:54 am
  Can a court determining a remand petition decide a question of personal jurisdiction (the Bauman issue) prior to a question of subject matter jurisdiction (fraudulent (mis)joinder)? [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:22 pm by Gary P. Rodrigues
Blake BrownProperty on Trial: Canadian Cases in Context edited by Eric Tucker, James Muir & Bruce Ziff\Broken Grounds: Criminal Law on the Aboriginal Plains, 1870-1905 by Shelley GaviganThe African-Canadians Legal Odyssey: Selected Essays edited by Barrington Walker 2011The Lazier Murder: Prince Edward County, 1884 by Robert J. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
We’ve made no secret of our distaste for the so called “heeding presumption” – that juries may presume that any alternative “adequate” warning would have been heeded by the plaintiff (or, in prescription medical product cases, the prescriber). [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Non-source info shouldn’t matter; and porting info for reasons unrelated to protectable to mark should also be irrelevant. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
  The insurance company referred the matter to the California Department of Insurance. [read post]